Working Paper · GovGreed Research · Accountability

The Goldman Rebuild

Sen. David McCormick — a member of the Senate Banking Committee — fully exited a Goldman Sachs position worth $1 million to $5 million in January 2026. A month later he began rebuilding it, one purchase at a time. The very first buy landed the same day a lobbying filing reported $300,000 spent on Dodd-Frank — the law his committee oversees. GovGreed's model scored the trade 91.54, the highest it has ever produced.

Live data Published July 1, 2026 Last verified July 1, 2026 ~9 min read Primary source: STOCK Act + Senate lobbying filings
Sen. David McCormick before the Senate Banking Committee
Oversight and ownership, in the same room. McCormick sits on the committee that writes the rules for the banks — and rebuilt a stake in the industry's flagship bank across seven purchases. Illustration for GovGreed Research.
Abstract

Sen. David McCormick (R-PA), a member of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, fully sold a Goldman Sachs position worth $1 million to $5 million on January 23, 2026, then rebuilt it across seven separate purchases — February 23, 24, 25, March 3, March 10, May 27, and June 2 — each in the $100,001–$250,000 bracket, for a combined disclosed range of $700,007 to $1,750,000. The first purchase landed the same day a lobbying filing reported $300,000 on implementation of P.L. 111-203, the Dodd-Frank Act — the law his committee oversees; the average lobbying-to-trade gap was 5.2 days. GovGreed's model scored the trade 91.54 — S tier, PERFECT_STORM convergence, the highest master score it has produced — on the Committee-Trader and Lobbying-Influence signals. This is a structural-overlap finding: nothing here is illegal, and Goldman's stock rose broadly across the market all year.

7
Purchases to rebuild
the sold-out position
+10.3%
Blended paper gain
by Jun 29, 2026
5.2 days
Avg filing→trade gap
same-day first buy
91.54
Master score
S · PERFECT_STORM

1. A clean exit, then a methodical rebuild

On January 23, 2026, Sen. David McCormick (R-PA) fully sold a Goldman Sachs position worth $1 million to $5 million. It is worth stating plainly, because it is the honest context for everything that follows: he was out of the stock entirely. A month later he began buying it back — not in one lump, but across seven separate disclosed purchases: February 23, 24, and 25, then March 3 and March 10, and finally May 27 and June 2. Each landed in the same $100,001-to-$250,000 bracket. Combined, the disclosed range on the rebuilt position runs $700,007 to $1,750,000.

This paper asks a narrow, checkable question: what did the rebuild line up with? The answer is a committee seat, a lobbying filing, and a public law — all pointing at the same bank.

2. Data and methodology

Every figure here is drawn from public federal records. The January sale and all seven purchase dates, dollar brackets, and the ticker come from McCormick's own filed Periodic Transaction Reports under the STOCK Act. Every Goldman Sachs closing price on his entry dates, and the June 29, 2026 close, come from GovGreed's daily price history. The $300,000 Dodd-Frank lobbying filing, its date, and the 5.2-day average gap from filing to trade are recorded in GovGreed's lobbying-pattern data drawn from Senate LDA filings. His seat on the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs comes from committee assignments. The composite 91.54 score is produced by GovGreed's seven-layer signal model.

Two cautions. Blended and per-tranche returns are computed on disclosed closing prices, not on the member's actual fills, which fall inside a bracket rather than at a single number. And the paper-gain range is bounded by the disclosed dollar brackets, not a precise cost basis. We measure the overlap and the price move; we do not allege intent.

3. The overlap: the committee, the law, and the bank

McCormick sits on the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs — the panel with direct jurisdiction over Dodd-Frank and the banks it regulates. On February 23, 2026, a lobbying filing reported $300,000 spent on the “implementation of P.L. 111-203, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and other issues related to the financial services industry.” That is a specific, verifiable public-law citation, not a vague description. The same day, McCormick made the first of his seven Goldman purchases.

That three-way overlap — a committee seat over the industry, a trade in the industry's flagship bank, and the industry's own lobbyists filing on the industry's core law — is what GovGreed's engine is built to catch. It scored this trade 91.54: S tier, PERFECT_STORM convergence, the highest master score the model has ever produced on any trade. Two signals fired — Committee-Trader (he sits on the committee that regulates the sector) and Lobbying-Influence (the trade tracks the industry's lobbying activity).

The first of the seven purchases landed the same day Goldman's lobbyists filed $300,000 of work on Dodd-Frank — the law McCormick's committee oversees. GovGreed measured the gap between filing and trade at 5.2 days.

4. The receipts: seven entries, one climbing stock

Goldman Sachs closed at an average of $924.77 across McCormick's seven entry points. By June 29, 2026, it closed at $1,020.21 — a blended gain of just over ten percent on the full position, and better than fifteen percent on the five earliest purchases alone, the ones made before the stock's biggest run. Table 1 lays out every entry.

Table 1 · The January sale and the seven-purchase rebuild
DateActionDisclosed bracketGS closeNote
Jan 23, 2026Full sale$1M–$5MOut of the stock entirely (context)
Feb 23, 2026Buy #1$100,001–$250,000$892.31Same day as the $300K Dodd-Frank filing · first five
Feb 24, 2026Buy #2$100,001–$250,000$902.27First five
Feb 25, 2026Buy #3$100,001–$250,000$921.38First five
Mar 3, 2026Buy #4$100,001–$250,000$862.58First five
Mar 10, 2026Buy #5$100,001–$250,000$833.81Last of the first five, before the run
May 27, 2026Buy #6$100,001–$250,000$996.47
Jun 2, 2026Buy #7$100,001–$250,000$1,064.58

Average entry across all seven buys: $924.77; across the first five alone: $882.47. Latest close (Jun 29, 2026): $1,020.21 — blended +10.3% on all seven, +15.6% on the first five. Prices are disclosed daily closes. Verified June 29, 2026. Look up the trade on the member page.

Applied to the disclosed dollar range, that puts the unrealized paper gain on the rebuilt position somewhere between $72,000 and $180,000 as of June 29.

Official footage. Sen. David McCormick before the Senate Banking Committee (his own official Senate channel, April 2026), recounting his Wall Street career and his role in the 2008 financial crisis while introducing a Federal Reserve nominee. Same committee, same financial-regulation domain this paper sits in — shown for context, not as evidence about any trade.

5. Discussion

The rebuild is notable less for its return than for its shape. A member sold out of a bank entirely, then re-entered it seven times, with the first entry synchronized to the day the industry's lobbyists filed paperwork on the exact law his committee governs. None of that requires a theory of intent to be worth documenting: the overlap between oversight, lobbying, and ownership is visible in the public record on its own. It is also the reason the pattern recurs — a committee seat conveys both influence over an industry and a vantage point on it, and the disclosures keep showing members holding the industries they regulate.

6. Limitations and caveats

This is the part to read slowly. Nothing here says McCormick knew Goldman Sachs would rise, and nothing here is an accusation of insider trading. Goldman's stock climbed broadly across the market all year, regardless of who was buying it, and none of these trades is illegal. The honest context includes the January sale: he was fully out before he rebuilt, and omitting that would misrepresent the record.

What makes the record notable is that it is the second time GovGreed's model has caught David McCormick in the exact same shape — a member of the committee that regulates an industry, buying that industry's flagship stock within days of that industry's own lobbyists filing paperwork. The first time, it was a Bitcoin ETF. This time, it is Goldman Sachs. The pattern is what keeps recurring, not the legality of any single trade.

7. Conclusion

Strip the trade to its bones and three public facts sit on top of one another: a Banking Committee seat, a $300,000 lobbying filing on Dodd-Frank, and a seven-part rebuild of a Goldman Sachs stake that began the same day. No single purchase has to be improper for the overlap to matter. It is the second time the model has drawn the same shape around the same senator — and it is exactly the kind of structural conflict the congressional-trading-ban debate is about.

Data availability

Primary sources. The January sale and the seven purchases (dates, dollar brackets, ticker) come from McCormick's congressional Periodic Transaction Reports (STOCK Act). Goldman Sachs closing prices come from the daily_prices reference. The $300,000 Dodd-Frank filing and the 5.2-day filing-to-trade gap come from GovGreed's lobbying_patterns over Senate LDA filings. Committee membership comes from committee_assignments. The 91.54 composite comes from signal_scores.

Derived dataset. The entry-price table, blended and first-five returns, and the paper-gain range are reproducible from the member's trade history and the price series on the platform. A machine-readable export is available on request — see “Sourcing this for a story?” below.

Reproducibility & verification

This is an independent working paper. Produced by GovGreed Research; not externally peer-reviewed. The seven entry prices, the $924.77 and $882.47 averages, the $1,020.21 close, the +10.3% and +15.6% blended gains, the 5.2-day lobbying gap, and the 91.54 score were re-derived live on the publication date and verified as of June 29, 2026.

Conflict of interest & funding

GovGreed is a commercial congressional-trading-intelligence platform; GovGreed Research is its analysis function. This paper received no external funding, and Sen. McCormick was given no prior review. It uses only public federal records and is released free to read, quote, and reproduce under CC BY 4.0 with attribution. Nothing here alleges wrongdoing. None of these trades is illegal, the stock rose broadly across the market all year, and we make no claim that McCormick had non-public information — the finding is the structural overlap of committee, lobbying, and ownership, and the fact that it is the second time the model has caught the same shape around the same senator.

Revision history

v1.0 · 2026-07-01 — Initial publication. Trade record, entry prices, lobbying timing, and the 91.54 score derived live and verified as of June 29, 2026.

Frequently asked

Did McCormick do anything illegal?
No. Buying and selling stock with STOCK Act disclosure is legal, and Goldman's stock rose broadly across the market all year. This is a structural-overlap finding, not an accusation of insider trading.
What was the lobbying filing?
On February 23, 2026, a filing reported $300,000 spent on implementation of P.L. 111-203, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and other financial-services issues. McCormick's first Goldman purchase landed the same day; the average gap from filing to trade was 5.2 days.
Why does the January sale matter?
Because it is the honest context. On January 23, 2026, McCormick fully sold a $1M–$5M Goldman position — he was out of the stock entirely before rebuilding it across seven purchases. Omitting the sale would misrepresent the record.
What does the 91.54 score mean?
It is GovGreed's composite master score — S tier, PERFECT_STORM convergence — the highest the model has produced on any trade. Two signals fired: Committee-Trader and Lobbying-Influence.
Is it legal for a Banking Committee member to trade bank stocks?
Currently yes, with disclosure. No rule bars a member from trading in the industry their committee regulates. The recurring reform proposals — a stock-ownership ban or mandatory blind trusts — target exactly this overlap.

Sourcing this for a story?

Free to use in a thread, article, or video — just credit GovGreed with a link to this page. Want the full trade-by-trade export, the lobbying-filing detail, or McCormick's committee-by-sector breakdown? Email govgreed@gmail.com — usually 24–48h, free with a link credit.

References & data sources

  1. STOCK Act disclosures — McCormick's congressional Periodic Transaction Reports, in GovGreed's Congress database; full history on his member page.
  2. Senate lobbying filings (LDA) — the $300,000 Dodd-Frank filing and the 5.2-day filing-to-trade gap, recorded in GovGreed's lobbying-pattern data.
  3. Committee assignments — McCormick's seat on the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, the panel with Dodd-Frank jurisdiction.
  4. Daily closing prices — Goldman Sachs closes on each entry date and the June 29, 2026 close, from GovGreed's price history.
  5. Signal model — the 91.54 composite (S tier, PERFECT_STORM) from GovGreed's seven-layer master score. How the scoring works.
  6. Companion papersThe Committee Advantage · The Pelosi Options Machine.

Keep pulling the thread

See the receipts — free

Every congressional trade, scored against the committees, lobbyists, and bills behind it. Free account: today’s top 10 signals + predictions. No card required.

Not financial advice. All data from public federal disclosures.