Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician's trading record is negligible, with only 4 total trades over the last five years, all sales, and a total volume of $60,000 (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_volume_5yr_usd`). There is no sector anomaly to report, as the single sector with trades, financial services, has only 4 trades and no calculable win-rate (`get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise[0].trade_count`). All 4 trades were filed late, with a 100% late filing rate and an average disclosure gap of 314.5 days (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.late_filing_rate_pct`, `get_sponsor_profile.profile.trading_style`).
Trades 5y4
Volume$32K
Late filing—
Trader typeMinimal activity
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
Total PAC direct contributions exceed $22 million over recent cycles, with energy (10.4%), defense (7.9%), and telecom (4.2%) as top-funded sectors aligned with committee jurisdiction (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.total_pac_direct_usd`, `get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`). Individual contributions are a minor component, totaling $2.37M (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_indiv_raised_usd`). The profile indicates a strong industry capture signal driven by this alignment (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.industry_capture_signal`).
PAC raised$22.1M
Individual—
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Energy and defense industries, via PAC contributions totaling $4.03M (18.3% of total PAC funds), aligned with the member's committee jurisdiction (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`).
Energy
$2.29M from energy PACs (10.4% of total) to a member of the Energy and Commerce Committee (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[1]`).
↳ PAC donations funding committee member overseeing sector policy
Defense
$1.74M from defense PACs (7.9% of total) (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[3]`).
↳ PAC donations to a committee with jurisdiction over defense-related telecommunications and technology
Top influence channels
PAC Donations
corporate_other industry PACs
$22.1M
Lobbying Targeting Committees
HOSPICE COMPASSUS
$9.0M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 18 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 19 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Stronger Engagement for Indian Health Needs Act of 2025
Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act of 2025
AI PLAN Act
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Action Versus No Action Act
The U.S.-European Nuclear Energy Cooperation Act of 2025
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2025
National Nursing Workforce Center Act of 2025
National Biotechnology Initiative Act of 2025
Voting Pattern
Voting attendance is 100% on 75 recent votes, with a yea/nay split of 39 to 31 (`get_voting_record.attendance_pct`, `get_voting_record.yea_count`, `get_voting_record.nay_count`). Recent high-profile votes include support for bills like HR.2493 and S.1020, which pertain to his committee's energy and commerce sectors (`get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes`).
Loading intelligence layer…