Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician's trading record is negligible, with only 4 total trades over the last five years, all sales, and a total volume of $60,000 (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_volume_5yr_usd`). There is no sector anomaly to report, as the single sector with trades, financial services, has only 4 trades and no calculable win-rate (`get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise[0].trade_count`). All 4 trades were filed late, with a 100% late filing rate and an average disclosure gap of 314.5 days (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.late_filing_rate_pct`, `get_sponsor_profile.profile.trading_style`).
Trades 5y0
Buys / sells0 / 0
Volume 5y—
Late filing—
Trader typeMinimal activity
Narrative from model run 2026-04-30; figures in the stat row are live (deduplicated, 5y).
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
Total PAC direct contributions exceed $22 million over recent cycles, with energy (10.4%), defense (7.9%), and telecom (4.2%) as top-funded sectors aligned with committee jurisdiction (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.total_pac_direct_usd`, `get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`). Individual contributions are a minor component, totaling $2.37M (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_indiv_raised_usd`). The profile indicates a strong industry capture signal driven by this alignment (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.industry_capture_signal`).
Direct PAC$5.2M
Outside $ for$88K
Outside $ against$22K
Cycles5
FEC PAC + independent-expenditure files, all cycles on record, never summed across direction. By cycle and industry →
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Energy and defense industries, via PAC contributions totaling $4.03M (18.3% of total PAC funds), aligned with the member's committee jurisdiction (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`).
Energy
$2.29M from energy PACs (10.4% of total) to a member of the Energy and Commerce Committee (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[1]`).
↳ PAC donations funding committee member overseeing sector policy
Defense
$1.74M from defense PACs (7.9% of total) (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[3]`).
↳ PAC donations to a committee with jurisdiction over defense-related telecommunications and technology
Top influence channels
PAC Donations
corporate_other industry PACs
$22.1M
Lobbying Targeting Committees
HOSPICE COMPASSUS
$9.0M
Committees1
Carve-outs on traded tickers0
Narrative from model run 2026-04-30. Jurisdiction vs. trades, committee by committee →
Recent Stock Trades · 5 oldest visible · 5 most recent 🔒 for Members
All 2 disclosed trades →🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 10 active · all →
↓ free sample below · 9 more for Members
Voting Pattern
Voting attendance is 100% on 75 recent votes, with a yea/nay split of 39 to 31 (`get_voting_record.attendance_pct`, `get_voting_record.yea_count`, `get_voting_record.nay_count`). Recent high-profile votes include support for bills like HR.2493 and S.1020, which pertain to his committee's energy and commerce sectors (`get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes`).
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Marc A. Veasey trade stocks?
Marc A. Veasey has 2 STOCK Act filings on record, but none dated within the last five years. Members must disclose trades over $1,000 within 45 days.
How can I track Marc A. Veasey's stock trades?
GovGreed ingests House Clerk STOCK Act filings daily and scores each trade against committee assignments, bill activity, and donor patterns. This page updates automatically; GovGreed members get real-time alerts the moment a new Marc A. Veasey disclosure lands.
Loading intelligence layer…