Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician's trading is dominated by municipal bond purchases across only 3 distinct tickers, with a top-5 ticker concentration of 100% and zero late filings, reflecting a conservative, fixed-income-oriented approach. However, the equity portfolio shows a severe anomaly: a 100% win rate in technology on 224 trades, outperforming the overall 32% win rate by 68 points, alongside significant outperformance in healthcare (69.2% win rate on 206 trades) and industrials (80% on 80 trades). Despite a 'POOR_PERFORMER' style tag, these sector-specific win rates suggest acute, non-public information advantages in committee-aligned sectors.
Trades 5y1,314
Volume$12.7M
Late filing—
Trader typeMixed
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC funding totals $13.84M over 5 years, with corporate_other comprising 33.2% ($4.6M) and defense 11.1% ($1.54M). Individual contributions are $4.79M, indicating a mid-to-large donor profile. Lobbying targeting the politician's committees totals $1.34M, with 100% alignment to committee jurisdictions (get_sponsor_profile.lobbying_to_committee_alignment_score).
PAC raised$13.8M
Individual—
Donors1,810
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Defense industry via PAC donations ($1.54M, 11.1% of total) and lobbying ($180,000 from DRONEUP) targeting aerospace committee jurisdiction, despite no defense committee seat.
technology
100% win rate on 224 trades vs. 32% overall, avg return 8.17% (PRE-COMPUTED SECTOR ANOMALIES[0])
↳ anomalous win rate
defense
$1.54M defense PAC donations (11.1% of total) and $180,000 lobbying from DRONEUP targeting aerospace (get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[1].amount_usd, get_lobbying_around_pol.top_lobbying_clients_targeting_pols_committees[0].total_spend)
↳ PAC donations without committee seat
Top influence channels
PAC donations
corporate_other
$13.8M
Lobbying spend targeting committees
DRONEUP
$1.3M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 25 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 8 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
AI PLAN Act
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
The U.S.-European Nuclear Energy Cooperation Act of 2025
National Biotechnology Initiative Act of 2025
DIGITAL Applications Act
GEO Act
NASA Transition Authorization Act of 2025
Facilitating DIGITAL Applications Act
Voting Pattern
Voting record shows 100% attendance on 75 recent votes, with 33 yea and 37 nay votes, indicating active participation but no clear partisan lean from the raw count; recent high-profile votes include yea on HR.2493 and S.1020, and nay on HR.261 (get_voting_record).
Loading intelligence layer…