Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
Mark Alford's trading activity is minimal and passive, consisting of 9 total sales with zero purchases over five years, as per `get_politician_intelligence.profile.total_trades`. The entire volume of roughly $140,000, from `get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_volume_5yr_usd`, was executed in a single day across broad-market ETFs and mega-cap stocks, indicating a liquidation of pre-existing holdings rather than active management. There are no sector win-rate anomalies, as `get_politician_intelligence.profile.win_rate_overall` is null and the `PRE-COMPUTED SECTOR ANOMALIES` array is empty.
Trades 5y9
Volume$72K
Late filing—
Trader typeMinimal activity
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC funding is diversified, with the top industry, 'corporate_other', representing 30.3% of a $4.98 million total, as shown in `get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`. Lobbying targeting his committees totals $14.48 million, with healthcare and defense clients like HOSPICE COMPASSUS ($1.72M) and AMERICAN LEGION ($1.33M) being most active, from `get_lobbying_around_pol.top_lobbying_clients_targeting_pols_committees`.
PAC raised$5.0M
Individual—
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Moderate capture signal across defense, agriculture, and telecom, driven by $472,000 in total lobbying spend and PAC support, per `get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_lobbying_spend_5yr_usd` and `get_donor_industry_breakdown`.
telecommunications
Lobbying alignment score of 100 from `get_sponsor_profile.profile.lobbying_to_committee_alignment_score`
↳ Committee jurisdiction (HSAP19) + personal trade (T sale) + lobbying client alignment
Top influence channels
Lobbying Spend
HOSPICE COMPASSUS
$14.5M
PAC Donations
corporate_other industry cluster
$5.0M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 25 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 32 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Stronger Engagement for Indian Health Needs Act of 2025
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act of 2025
AI PLAN Act
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Action Versus No Action Act
Justice for ALS Veterans Act of 2025
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2025
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2025
National Nursing Workforce Center Act of 2025
Voting Pattern
Voted yea on 58 of 75 total votes (77.3% yea rate) with 100% attendance, per `get_voting_record`. Recent high-profile votes include supporting HR.2493 and opposing HR.1689, indicating a party-aligned but not monolithic record.
Loading intelligence layer…