Plain English
Summary
Plain-English summary not yet available for this bill. Check back after our next analysis run.
Market Impact Map
Full Bill Text
119 HR 1035 IH: Job Protection Act U.S. House of Representatives 2025-02-05 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1035 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 5, 2025 Ms. Underwood (for herself, Ms. DeLauro , Ms. Chu , Ms. Meng , Mr. Takano , Ms. Castor of Florida , Ms. Ocasio-Cortez , Ms. Barragán , Mr. Magaziner , Mr. Beyer , Ms. Pressley , Ms. McBride , Mr. Deluzio , Mr. Kennedy of New York , Mr. Goldman of New York , Ms. Titus , Mr. DeSaulnier , Ms. Bonamici , Mrs. McBath , Mr. Nadler , Ms. Jayapal , Ms. McCollum , Mr. Gomez , Ms. Sánchez , Ms. Tokuda , Mrs. Cherfilus-McCormick , Mr. Cleaver , Mrs. Dingell , Mr. McGovern , Ms. Stansbury , Mr. Casar , Mr. Casten , Mr. Moulton , Mr. Frost , Mr. Carter of Louisiana , Mr. Mullin , Mr. McGarvey , Mr. Khanna , Ms. Strickland , Ms. Kelly of Illinois , Mr. Carson , Mr. Lynch , Ms. Clarke of New York , Ms. Ansari , Ms. Tlaib , Mr. Davis of North Carolina , Mr. Thanedar , Mrs. Hayes , Ms. Brown , Mrs. Watson Coleman , and Ms. Omar ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce , and in addition to the Committees on House Administration , and Oversight and Government Reform , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL To amend the Family and Medical Leave Act to expand employees eligible for leave and employers subject to leave requirements, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Job Protection Act . 2. Expansion of employees eligible for family and medical leave (a) In general Section 101(2) of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 ( 29 U.S.C. 2611(2) ) is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking employed— and all that follows through the end of the subparagraph and inserting employed for at least 90 days by the employer with respect to whom leave is requested under section 102. ; (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking does not include— and all that follows through the end of the subparagraph and inserting does not include any Federal officer or employee covered under subchapter V of chapter 63 of title 5, United States Code (as added by title II of this Act). ; (3) by striking subparagraphs (C) and (D); and (4) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as subparagraph (C). (b) Federal employees (1) In general Title 5, United States Code, is amended— (A) in section 6381(1)(B), by striking 12 months and inserting 90 days ; and (B) in section 6382(d)(2)(E), by striking 12 months and inserting 90 days . (2) Presidential employees Section 412(a)(2)(B) of title 3, United States Code, is amended by striking 12 months and for at least 1,250 hours of employment during the previous 12 months and inserting 90 days . (3) Congressional employees Section 202(a)(2)(B) of the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 ( 2 U.S.C. 1312(a)(2)(B) ) is amended by striking 12 months and for at least 1,250 hours of employment during the previous 12 months and inserting 90 days . 3. Expansion of employers subject to leave requirements Section 101(4)(A)(i) of such Act ( 29 U.S.C. 2611(4)(A)(i) ) is amended by striking 50 or more employees and all that follows through the end of the clause and inserting 1 or more employees; .
Loading intelligence layer…