🔓
Sign in as a Member to unlock the full view of S.1025. · Full carveout list, all affected companies, party defectors, and 30-day trade predictions.
Become a Member$24.50/mo already a Member? Sign in →
S.1025 · 119TH CONGRESS

FCC Legal Enforcement Act

Status
In Committee
Latest Action
2025-03-13
Sponsor
Luján, Ben Ray (D-New Mexico)
Official Source
Investability
16/100
Stage
COMMITTEE
Related Bills
0
Full Text
3,024 chars
Alive
Yes

What This Bill Does · Plain English

Summary
Plain-English summary not yet available for this bill. Check back after our next analysis run.

Action Timeline

2025-03-13
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
2025-03-13
Introduced in Senate

Frequently Asked Questions

Did S.1025 pass?
S.1025 is still alive. Current stage: COMMITTEE. Pass likelihood: 16%.
Who sponsored S.1025?
S.1025 was sponsored by Ben Ray Luján (D-New Mexico).

Full Bill Text

119 S1025 IS: FCC Legal Enforcement Act U.S. Senate 2025-03-13 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. II 119th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 1025 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES March 13, 2025 Mr. Luján (for himself, Mr. Blumenthal , Mr. Welch , Mr. Schatz , Mr. Durbin , and Ms. Klobuchar ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation A BILL To authorize the Federal Communications Commission to enforce its own forfeiture penalties with respect to violations of restrictions on the use of telephone equipment, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the FCC Legal Enforcement Act . 2. Enforcement of forfeiture penalties by Federal Communications Commission (a) In general Title V of the Communications Act of 1934 ( 47 U.S.C. 501 et seq. ) is amended— (1) in section 503(b)(3)(B) ( 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(3)(B) ), by striking In such action, and inserting the following: If, during the 120-day period beginning on the date of a referral of an unpaid forfeiture penalty imposed for a violation of section 227 (relating to restrictions on the use of telephone equipment), the Attorney General does not commence an action to recover the amount assessed, the Commission may commence and supervise the litigation of such an action and any appeal of such an action in its own name by any of its attorneys designated by it for such purpose. In any action under this subparagraph, ; and (2) in section 504(a) ( 47 U.S.C. 504(a) )— (A) by striking It shall be the duty and inserting Except as provided in the subsequent sentence, it shall be the duty ; and (B) by striking The costs and expenses of such prosecutions and inserting the following: If, during the 120-day period beginning on the date on which the Commission refers an unpaid forfeiture penalty imposed for a violation of section 227 (relating to restrictions on the use of telephone equipment) to the Attorney General for prosecution under this subsection, the Attorney General does not commence such a prosecution, the Commission may prosecute for the recovery of the forfeiture penalty. The costs and expenses of a prosecution under this subsection . (b) Priority In carrying out the amendments made by subsection (a) of this section, the Federal Communications Commission shall prioritize enforcement of unpaid forfeiture penalties imposed for a violation of section 227 of the Communications Act of 1934 ( 47 U.S.C. 227 ) (relating to restrictions on the use of telephone equipment) that are greater than $25,000,000. 3. Regulations for restrictions on use of automated telephone equipment Section 227(b)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934 ( 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(2) ) is amended, in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting before the period the following: as necessary in the judgment of the Commission to protect subscribers from unwanted calls .
🔒 GovGreed Pro · Trading Intelligence on S.1025 Get Access — $24.50/mo
Loading intelligence layer…
Bill text sourced from GovInfo.gov · public domain · last updated 2026-05-18. Plain-English summary, score breakdown, and trading-intelligence panels are GovGreed-original analysis derived from STOCK Act filings, SEC Form 4 disclosures, FEC contributions, and Senate LDA lobbying reports — all publicly filed federal records. GovGreed is not affiliated with the U.S. Government. Not financial advice. [live render]