🔓
Sign in as a Member to unlock the full view of HR.927. · Full carveout list, all affected companies, party defectors, and 30-day trade predictions.
Become a Member$24.50/mo already a Member? Sign in →
HR.927 · 119TH CONGRESS

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit institutions of higher education from requiring ideological oaths or similar statements, and for other purposes.

Status
In Committee
Latest Action
2025-02-04
Sponsor
Crenshaw, Dan (R-Texas)
Official Source
Investability
85/100
Stage
COMMITTEE
Related Bills
0
Full Text
2,851 chars
Alive
Yes

What This Bill Does · Plain English

Summary · Congress.gov
This bill prohibits an institution of higher education (IHE) that participates in federal student aid programs from requiring a student enrolled at the IHE, an employee or contractor of the IHE, or an applicant for admission to or employment or contracting at the IHE to make certain ideological oaths or similar statements. Specifically, the bill prohibits an IHE from compelling, requiring, inducing, or soliciting such an individual to (1) endorse an ideology that promotes the differential treatment of an individual or group of individuals based on race, color, or ethnicity; or (2) provide a statement indicating certain information about the individual, including the individual's views on efforts involving diversity, equity, and inclusion or other specified concepts. Additionally, the bill prohibits an IHE from providing preferential consideration to a student, employee, or contractor based on the individual's unsolicited support for an ideology that promotes the differential treatment of an individual or group of individuals based on race, color, or ethnicity.

Action Timeline

2025-02-04
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
2025-02-04
Introduced in House
2025-02-04
Introduced in House

Frequently Asked Questions

Did HR.927 pass?
HR.927 is still alive. Current stage: COMMITTEE. Pass likelihood: 85%.
What does HR.927 do?
This bill prohibits an institution of higher education (IHE) that participates in federal student aid programs from requiring a student enrolled at the IHE, an employee or contractor of the IHE, or an applicant for admission to or employment or contracting at the IHE to make certain ideological oaths or similar statements. Specifically, the bill prohibits an IHE from compelling, requiring, inducing, or soliciting such an individual to (1) endorse an ideology that promotes the differential treatment of an individual or group of individuals based on race, color, or ethnicity; or (2) provide a st…
Who sponsored HR.927?
HR.927 was sponsored by Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas).

Full Bill Text

119 HR 927 IH: To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit institutions of higher education from requiring ideological oaths or similar statements, and for other purposes. U.S. House of Representatives 2025-02-04 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 927 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 4, 2025 Mr. Crenshaw introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce A BILL To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit institutions of higher education from requiring ideological oaths or similar statements, and for other purposes. 1. Prohibition relating to ideological oaths and similar statements Section 487(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.S.C. 1094(a) ) is amended by adding at the end the following: (30) (A) The institution will not— (i) compel, require, induce, or solicit a student enrolled at the institution, an employee or contractor of the institution, or an applicant for admission to or employment or contracting at the institution to— (I) endorse an ideology that promotes the differential treatment of an individual or group of individuals based on race, color, or ethnicity; or (II) provide a statement indicating the person’s— (aa) race, color, ethnicity, or national origin, except to the minimum extent needed record any necessary demographic information; (bb) views on, experience with, or past or planned contributions to efforts involving diversity, equity, and inclusion, marginalized groups, antiracism, social justice, intersectionality, or related concepts; or (cc) views on or experience with race, color, ethnicity, national origin, or other immutable characteristics; or (ii) provide preferential consideration to a student enrolled at the institution, an employee or contractor of the institution, or an applicant for admission to or employment or contracting at the institution on the basis of the person’s unsolicited statement in support of an ideology described in clause (i)(I). (B) Nothing in this paragraph may be construed— (i) to restrict academic research or coursework; (ii) to prevent a person from providing to an institution of higher education the information described in subparagraph (A) on the person’s own initiative separate from any specific requirement or request from the institution; or (iii) to prevent an institution from requiring an applicant for admission to or employment or contracting at the institution to— (I) disclose or discuss the content of the applicant’s research or artistic creations; (II) certify compliance with State and Federal antidiscrimination law; or (III) discuss pedagogical approaches or experience with students with learning disabilities. .
🔒 GovGreed Pro · Trading Intelligence on HR.927 Get Access — $24.50/mo
Loading intelligence layer…
Bill text sourced from GovInfo.gov · public domain · last updated 2026-07-29. Plain-English summary, score breakdown, and trading-intelligence panels are GovGreed-original analysis derived from STOCK Act filings, SEC Form 4 disclosures, FEC contributions, and Senate LDA lobbying reports — all publicly filed federal records. GovGreed is not affiliated with the U.S. Government. Not financial advice. [live render]