Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician has executed 33 trades in the last five years with a 33% overall win rate (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.win_rate_overall`). A significant sector anomaly exists: a 100% win rate in finance (12 trades) and industrials (12 trades) diverges sharply from a 0% win rate in technology (18 trades) (`get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise`). This suggests a pattern of successful positioning in traditional sectors offset by poor performance in tech. The profile indicates an opportunistic, purchase-heavy style with a 24.2% late-filing rate and an average disclosure gap of 103.8 days (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.late_filing_rate_pct`, `.profile.trade_pattern`).
Trades 5y66
Volume$626K
Late filing—
Trader typeActive self-dealer
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
Total PAC direct contributions are $15.1M (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.total_pac_direct_usd`), with $6.2M from PACs for the member (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_pac_for_usd`). Top industries funding PACs are corporate_other, energy, and healthcare. Lobbying spend targeting the member's committee jurisdictions totals $13.0M over five years (`get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`).
PAC raised$15.1M
Individual—
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Energy industry capture is evident via $2.5M in PAC contributions (16.6% of total) and committee jurisdiction over energy policy (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[1]`, `get_lobbying_around_pol.committee_sectors`).
technology
18 trades in tech sector with 0% win rate, $520K total lobbying spend, recommended watchlist includes AMZN, AAPL, META (`get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise[0]`, `get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_lobbying_spend_5yr_usd`, `.profile.recommended_watchlist_tickers`)
↳ committee jurisdiction (Energy & Commerce) overlaps with personal trading in tech stocks (18 trades) and lobbying by tech clients
Top influence channels
PAC direct contributions
corporate_other industry PACs
$15.1M
Lobbying in committee jurisdiction
HOSPICE COMPASSUS
$13.0M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 25 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 32 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Stronger Engagement for Indian Health Needs Act of 2025
Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act of 2025
AI PLAN Act
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Action Versus No Action Act
Justice for ALS Veterans Act of 2025
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
The U.S.-European Nuclear Energy Cooperation Act of 2025
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2025
Voting Pattern
Voting attendance is 100% on 75 recent votes, with 53 yea and 9 nay votes (`get_voting_record.attendance_pct`, `.yea_count`, `.nay_count`). Recent high-profile votes show a mix of yea and nay positions, including not voting on several suspension motions in April 2026 (`get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes`).
Loading intelligence layer…