Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
Scale-first: The politician's 5-year trading profile shows 18 trades totaling $27.7M (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_volume_5yr_usd`), with a largest single trade of $5M. The activity is exclusively sales (100% sell rate, `get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_pattern`), indicating a managed divestiture or portfolio liquidation pattern rather than active accumulation. With only 9 trades in the 5-year intelligence aggregate (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.total_trades`) and a quality tier of 'F', this is a low-frequency, high-value seller. There is no sector win-rate anomaly to report, as the `PRE-COMPUTED SECTOR ANOMALIES` array is empty and overall win rates are null.
Trades 5y48
Volume$18.0M
Late filing—
Trader typeMinimal activity
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC funding totals $23.7M over 5 years (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.total_pac_direct_usd`), with the top industry being 'corporate_other' at 39.4% of the total. Individual contributions raised $20.1M (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_indiv_raised_usd`). The donor-to-committee alignment score is 72 (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.donor_to_committee_alignment_score`), indicating strong structural overlap between donor industries (finance, defense, tech) and his committee jurisdictions (Banking, Intelligence).
PAC raised$23.7M
Individual—
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Finance industry capture is indicated by $1.97M in PAC donations (8.3% of total, `get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[1]`) and a 72 donor alignment score with his Banking Committee seats, creating a persistent regulatory feedback loop.
finance
$1.97M from finance PACs (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[1].amount_usd`) while serving on Securities, Insurance, and Investment (SSBK04) and Financial Institutions (SSBK08) subcommittees.
↳ PAC donations influencing Banking Committee regulatory oversight
defense/tech
$1.22M from defense PACs and $948K from tech PACs (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[3,8].amount_usd`) while serving as Ranking Member of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SLIN).
↳ Defense and tech PAC donations intersecting with Intelligence Committee oversight of contractors and platforms
Top influence channels
PAC Donations
corporate_other
$23.7M
Lobbying Targeting Committees
HOSPICE COMPASSUS
$15.8M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 0 votes (12mo)
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 25 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 31 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Stronger Engagement for Indian Health Needs Act of 2025
AI PLAN Act
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Action Versus No Action Act
Justice for ALS Veterans Act of 2025
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2025
The U.S.-European Nuclear Energy Cooperation Act of 2025
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
National Nursing Workforce Center Act of 2025
Loading intelligence layer…