Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
Rep. Torres exhibits a high-frequency, committee-aligned trading pattern with 246 trades over 5 years ($3.69M volume) but poor performance (43% overall win rate, -1.4% avg excess return). His trading is concentrated in technology (48 trades, 73.3% win rate) and finance (42 trades, 80% win rate), sectors directly under his Financial Services Committee jurisdiction. This represents a significant anomaly: his win rates in technology and finance diverge by +30.3 and +37 points respectively from his overall 43% win rate, on a combined 90 trades (well above the 50-trade threshold). His style is characterized as a 'diversifier' across 61 tickers with an extremely high average disclosure lag of 187.9 days and a 54% late filing rate (132 of 246 trades), indicating systematic compliance failures.
Trades 5y246
Volume$2.0M
Late filing—
Trader typeActive self-dealer
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
Total PAC direct contributions of $8.4M over 5 years, led by corporate_other at 33.8% ($2.84M), finance at 13.4% ($1.13M), and labor at 11.3% ($950K). Individual contributions total $15.96M from 7,411 donors, with an average donation size of $1,477 indicating a dual base of small online donors and a tight Manhattan finance network. Lobbying spend targeting his committee sectors totals $3.49M over 5 years.
PAC raised$8.4M
Individual—
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Finance industry capture via $1.13M in PAC contributions (13.4% of total) and $3.49M in lobbying targeting his financial services committees, coupled with 80% win rate on 42 finance sector trades.
finance
80% win rate on 42 finance trades, $1.13M PAC from finance, $3.49M lobbying targeting his finance committees.
↳ committee jurisdiction + trading + donor overlap
technology
73.3% win rate on 48 technology trades, while overall win rate is 43%.
↳ committee jurisdiction + trading
Top influence channels
PAC direct contributions
corporate_other industry
$8.4M
Lobbying targeting their committees
JUMP CRYPTO HOLDINGS LLC
$3.5M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 24 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 9 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
AI PLAN Act
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
National Biotechnology Initiative Act of 2025
Dental Care for Veterans Act
DIGITAL Applications Act
ACRES Act
LASSO Act
Facilitating DIGITAL Applications Act
Voting Pattern
Voting record shows 100% attendance over 75 recent votes, with 30 yea and 37 nay votes, indicating a willingness to break with party majority on certain issues. Recent high-profile votes include yea on HR.1689 (passed) and nay on HR.261 (passed), suggesting independent positioning on financial services matters.
Loading intelligence layer…