Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
Rep. Sewell's trading activity is minimal, with only 6 trades over 5 years and a total volume of approximately $130,000, as per `get_sponsor_profile.trade_volume_5yr_usd`. Her trades are concentrated in large-cap technology names (AAPL, NVDA) with a 100% win rate in the technology sector on 4 trades, per `sector_expertise`. However, this anomaly is based on a small sample size and does not meet the threshold for a sector anomaly (≥50 trades). She shows no late filings (`get_sponsor_profile.late_filing_rate_pct`: 0) and an average disclosure gap of 32 days.
Trades 5y6
Volume$73K
Late filing—
Trader typeMinimal activity
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC contributions total $34.97 million over 5 years, with corporate_other accounting for 36.8% (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[0].pct_of_total`). Top PAC industries are finance, healthcare, and insurance, aligning with her Ways and Means Committee jurisdiction. Individual donations are small, with 1,511 unique donors averaging $934.
PAC raised$35.0M
Individual—
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Finance and healthcare industries dominate PAC contributions, comprising 18% combined (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[2].pct_of_total` + `top_industries[1].pct_of_total`), via committee jurisdiction over tax and health policy.
technology
AAPL trade plus $80,000 lobbying spend, per `get_sponsor_profile.total_lobbying_spend_5yr_usd`
↳ stock holding while company lobbies committee
finance
$2.85 million from finance PACs, 8.2% of total, per `get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[2]`
↳ PAC contributions from regulated industry
Top influence channels
PAC contributions
corporate_other
$35.0M
Lobbying spend targeting committees
Not specified
$80K
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 357 votes (12mo) · 200 on passage · 85% with party on passage votes · 3 against
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 25 active
Recent Activity
Voting Pattern
Voting record shows 35 yea and 35 nay votes out of 75 total, with 100% attendance (`get_voting_record.attendance_pct`). Recent high-profile votes include yea on HR.1689 and nay on HR.261, indicating party-line voting with some divergence.
Loading intelligence layer…