Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician's trading activity is minimal and passive, with no sector anomalies to report. `get_politician_intelligence.profile` shows only 13 total trades, a 50% overall win rate, and an average position size of less than one cent, indicating negligible personal market engagement. The `get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_pattern` describes the activity as concentrated in diversified ETFs and mutual funds with zero options or late filings, consistent with a managed or advisory account.
Trades 5y16
Volume$128K
Late filing—
Trader typeMinimal activity
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
The funding structure is heavily reliant on corporate PACs, with defense being the leading industry. `get_sponsor_profile.profile` notes a 'strong' industry_capture_signal, driven by a $2.32M lobbying spend over five years that aligns perfectly (100% score) with his committee jurisdiction. Individual donors are geographically dispersed and not a primary financial base.
PAC raised$2.0M
Individual—
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Defense industry capture via PAC contributions totaling $1.81M (20.8% of total PAC funds) and perfect lobbying alignment, mechanism is appropriations jurisdiction.
Defense
$1.81M from defense PACs (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[1].amount_usd`)
↳ PAC contributions funding campaign while serving on Defense Appropriations Subcommittee
Telecom
Held T stock (`recent_trades[0].ticker`) while AT&T is listed as lobbying client (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.recommended_watchlist_tickers`)
↳ Personal stock holding (T) overlaps with sole lobbying client (AT&T) and committee jurisdiction
Top influence channels
PAC Contributions
Defense Industry PACs
$2.0M
Lobbying Spend Targeting Committees
AT&T (sole lobbying client)
$232K
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 18 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 25 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Stronger Engagement for Indian Health Needs Act of 2025
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Action Versus No Action Act
Justice for ALS Veterans Act of 2025
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2025
National Nursing Workforce Center Act of 2025
Purple Heart Veterans Education Act of 2025
Ensuring Veterans’ Final Resting Place Act of 2025
Student Veteran Benefit Restoration Act of 2025
Voting Pattern
`get_voting_record` shows high attendance (100%) and a strong party-line voting tendency, with 61 yea votes versus 9 nay votes out of 75 total recent votes. Recent high-profile votes include supporting passage of bills like HR.2493 and S.1020.
Loading intelligence layer…