Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
Ross is an active trader with a medium frequency, executing 56 trades ($2.06M volume) skewed heavily toward purchases (38 buys vs. 16 sales). Her overall win rate is 44% with an average excess return of -3.8%, classifying her as a poor performer. A significant sector anomaly exists: she has a 63.6% win rate on 32 technology trades, which is 19.6 points above her overall win rate, despite an average return of -0.12% in that sector. This contrasts sharply with a 0% win rate on 4 finance trades. Her trading style is opportunistic, with a 10.7% options share and no family trades reported.
Trades 5y56
Volume$1.3M
Late filing—
Trader typeActive self-dealer
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC support ($2.2M direct) increasingly dominates over individual giving ($4.0M), with PAC share rising each cycle (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.donor_base`). The top PAC industries are corporate_other (33.7%), labor (16.7%), and pharma (6.3%) (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`). Total lobbying spend targeting her committee sectors is $1.34M (`get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`).
PAC raised$9.2M
Individual—
Donors2,362
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Technology industry capture via committee jurisdiction (Judiciary, Courts, IP, AI subcommittee) and $1.34M in targeted lobbying, with clients like BlackBerry Corp. and LEGO Systems (`get_lobbying_around_pol`).
technology
100% lobbying alignment score, $1.34M in sector lobbying (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.lobbying_to_committee_alignment_score`, `get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`)
↳ jurisdictional capture via committee membership
Top influence channels
PAC direct
corporate_other PACs
$9.2M
Lobbying targeting their committees
DRONEUP
$1.3M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 357 votes (12mo) · 200 on passage · 90% with party on passage votes · 2 against
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 25 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 2 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Voting Pattern
In the current Congress, she has voted 34 times yea and 36 times nay on 75 total votes, with 100% attendance (`get_voting_record`). Recent high-profile votes include yea on HR.2493 and S.1020, and nay on HR.261 (`get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes`).
Loading intelligence layer…