Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
Senator Peters exhibits a high-frequency trading style with 85 trades in the 5-year dataset, averaging $37,176 per position, but is a poor performer with a 21% overall win rate. His sector performance shows extreme divergence: a 100% win rate in real estate (12 trades, avg return 5.0%), consumer cyclical (6 trades, 4.92%), agriculture (5 trades, 5.59%), and technology (5 trades, 7.42%), starkly contrasting with 0% win rates in energy (10 trades, -9.89%), industrials (6 trades, -6.88%), and pharma (5 trades, -7.98%). This anomaly suggests selective, possibly informed success in non-core sectors versus losses in others. His trading is classified as COMMITTEE_TRADER and HIGH_FREQUENCY, yet his bill activity correlation is low (avg 34.5%) with zero suspicious timing counts, indicating trades may not be directly timed to legislative actions.
Trades 5y167
Volume$1.9M
Late filing—
Trader typeMixed
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC fundraising totals $19.3M, with corporate_other comprising 40.5% ($7.83M) of PAC direct contributions per get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries. Individual contributions reached $29.96M in the 2020 cycle, but off-cycle reverts to a narrow elite network. Lobbying targeting his committees totals $15.45M over 5 years, with strong alignment (100% score) between lobbying spend and his committee jurisdictions per get_sponsor_profile.lobbying_to_committee_alignment_score.
PAC raised$19.3M
Individual$30.0M
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Corporate_other industry dominates PAC contributions at 40.5% ($7.83M), with finance, tech, and defense also significant; lobbying clients like HOSPICE COMPASSUS ($1.72M) target healthcare issues under his committee purview.
healthcare
get_lobbying_around_pol.top_lobbying_clients_targeting_pols_committees
↳ Lobbying by HOSPICE COMPASSUS ($1.72M) targeting committees he sits on
defense
get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries
↳ PAC contributions from defense industry ($740,000) while serving on Armed Services
Top influence channels
Individual contributions
Michigan high-net-worth individuals
$30.0M
PAC contributions
corporate_other
$19.3M
Lobbying spend targeting committee sectors
HOSPICE COMPASSUS
$15.4M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 0 votes (12mo)
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 25 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 32 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Stronger Engagement for Indian Health Needs Act of 2025
AI PLAN Act
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Action Versus No Action Act
Justice for ALS Veterans Act of 2025
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2025
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
National Nursing Workforce Center Act of 2025
National Biotechnology Initiative Act of 2025
Loading intelligence layer…