Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician has filed zero trades since taking office, as per `get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_pattern`: 'inactive' and `get_sponsor_profile.profile.trading_style`: 'McDowell has filed zero trades since taking office...'. There are no sector anomalies to report, as `get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise` is an empty array and `recent_trades` is empty. The scale is defined by zero trades, zero trade volume, and a donor base of 284 individual donors in the 'other' industry category from `get_sponsor_profile.profile.top_donor_industries` and $2.59M in PAC funding from `get_donor_industry_breakdown.total_pac_direct_usd`.
Trades 5y0
Volume—
Late filing—
Trader typeMinimal activity
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC funding totals $2.59M, with 33% from 'corporate_other' and 19.1% from 'leadership_pac' as per `get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`. Individual contributions total $965,136, with the top industry being 'other' at 284 donors from `get_sponsor_profile.profile.top_donor_industries`. The funding is broad-based with no single industry dominating, though notable crypto-linked donations exist from Winklevoss Capital, as noted in `get_sponsor_profile.profile.donor_base`.
PAC raised$2.6M
Individual—
Donors284
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Low capture signal; agriculture and energy industries provide 5.6% and 3.6% of PAC funding respectively via `get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`, but no dominant single-industry control.
energy
Energy industry provided $92,000 in PAC funding (3.6% of total) per get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[8]
↳ committee jurisdiction (Natural Resources) plus donor funding
agriculture
Agriculture industry provided $144,500 in PAC funding (5.6% of total) per get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[2] and top lobbying client Hormel Foods (HRL) spent $1.17M per get_lobbying_around_pol.top_lobbying_clients_targeting_pols_committees[1]
↳ committee jurisdiction (Natural Resources subcommittees) plus lobbying
Top influence channels
Lobbying targeting committees
HOSPICE COMPASSUS
$18.1M
PAC funding
corporate_other
$2.6M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 25 active
Recent Activity
No reported stock trades.
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 19 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Stronger Engagement for Indian Health Needs Act of 2025
Action Versus No Action Act
The U.S.-European Nuclear Energy Cooperation Act of 2025
Rural Obstetrics Readiness Act
National Nursing Workforce Center Act of 2025
Dental Care for Veterans Act
National Emergency Medical Services Memorial Extension Act
GEO Act
NASA Transition Authorization Act of 2025
ACRES Act
LASSO Act
Voting Pattern
Voted 'yea' on 59 of 75 total votes (78.7% support for leadership) with 100% attendance, as per `get_voting_record.yea_count` and `get_voting_record.attendance_pct`. Recent high-profile votes include support for HR.2493 and S.1020, and opposition to HR.1689 from `get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes`.
Loading intelligence layer…