Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
Representative Mackenzie has filed zero trades since taking office, with a `get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_trades_5yr` of 0 and a `get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_volume_5yr_usd` of null. His `get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_pattern` is 'inactive', and no sector anomalies exist as there is no trading history to analyze. The absence of personal financial activity in public markets eliminates a primary channel for conflict-of-interest analysis.
Trades 5y0
Volume—
Late filing—
Trader typeMinimal activity
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC fundraising totals $3.35M, with 35.0% from leadership PACs and 28.2% from corporate other sources, per `get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`. Individual contributions total $1.58M (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_indiv_raised_usd`). The top PAC industries are ideological_conservative, gun_rights, real_estate, and leadership_pac_uncategorized (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.top_pac_industries`).
PAC raised$3.3M
Individual—
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Low capture signal; donor base is diffuse with retirees as top individual donors, and no single industry dominates PAC giving above 35% (leadership PACs).
energy
Energy sector donors present in `get_sponsor_profile.profile.top_donor_industries` and $110,000 from energy PACs in `get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`.
↳ Committee jurisdiction (Homeland Security infrastructure) alignment with donor interests
healthcare
$1.72M spent by HOSPICE COMPASSUS targeting healthcare issues related to his committee, per `get_lobbying_around_pol.top_lobbying_clients_targeting_pols_committees`.
↳ Lobbying targeting his committee (HSED02 - Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions)
Top influence channels
Lobbying Targeting Committees
HOSPICE COMPASSUS
$15.4M
PAC Fundraising
leadership_pac
$3.3M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 25 active
Recent Activity
No reported stock trades.
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 34 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Stronger Engagement for Indian Health Needs Act of 2025
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act of 2025
AI PLAN Act
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Action Versus No Action Act
Justice for ALS Veterans Act of 2025
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2025
The U.S.-European Nuclear Energy Cooperation Act of 2025
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
Voting Pattern
Voting record shows 59 yea and 10 nay votes out of 75 total, with 100% attendance (`get_voting_record`). Recent high-profile votes include yea on HR.2493 and S.1020, and a nay on HR.1689, indicating a generally supportive party-line voting pattern with occasional dissent.
Loading intelligence layer…