Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician's portfolio is concentrated in a narrow basket of six mega-cap technology and financial services tickers, including NVDA, AAPL, and SCHW, with zero options activity and no family trades. The trading style is passive and index-adjacent, as indicated by a 0% late filing rate and a 30-day average disclosure gap (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.late_filing_rate_pct`, `get_sponsor_profile.profile.trading_style`). A significant sector performance anomaly exists: a 100% win rate in the finance sector across 8 trades diverges +44 points from the 56% overall win rate (`get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise[1].win_rate`, `get_politician_intelligence.profile.win_rate_overall`).
Trades 5y44
Volume$401K
Late filing—
Trader typeMixed
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC funding totals $2.65M, led by corporate_other (32.0%, $2.19M) and labor (20.3%, $1.39M) industries (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_pac_for_usd`, `get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`). Individual contributions total $4.11M, creating a distributed, non-captive funding base. Lobbying spend targeting the politician's committee jurisdictions totals $11.88M, with healthcare clients like HOSPICE COMPASSUS ($1.72M) being most active (`get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`, `get_lobbying_around_pol.top_lobbying_clients_targeting_pols_committees`).
PAC raised$6.8M
Individual—
Donors1,516
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Healthcare industry employs committee-aligned lobbying, with $11.88M spent targeting the politician's jurisdictions, led by hospice and pharmaceutical clients (`get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`, `get_lobbying_around_pol.top_lobbying_clients_targeting_pols_committees`).
healthcare
$11.88M in lobbying targets Budget, Small Business, and Veterans' Affairs committees
↳ committee jurisdiction lobbying
technology/finance
100% overlap between lobbied tickers and traded tickers per sponsor profile
↳ personal portfolio overlap
Top influence channels
Lobbying in committee jurisdiction
HOSPICE COMPASSUS
$11.9M
pac funding
corporate_other industry bloc
$6.8M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 24 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 18 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Stronger Engagement for Indian Health Needs Act of 2025
Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act of 2025
AI PLAN Act
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Action Versus No Action Act
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2025
National Nursing Workforce Center Act of 2025
National Biotechnology Initiative Act of 2025
Dental Care for Veterans Act
Voting Pattern
Over 75 recent votes, the record shows a 100% attendance rate with 32 yea and 38 nay votes, indicating active participation but no clear partisan bloc alignment from the sample (`get_voting_record.yea_count`, `get_voting_record.nay_count`, `get_voting_record.attendance_pct`).
Loading intelligence layer…