Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
Rep. Landsman is a high-frequency, sector-concentrated trader with 161 trades in the last five-year window, averaging $16,149 per position. His portfolio is heavily skewed toward technology and infrastructure, with his top five tickers accounting for 47.6% of activity. A significant anomaly is his technology sector performance: with 112 trades, he achieves a 73.2% win rate and 4.86% average return, which diverges +42.2 points from his overall 31% win rate. This contrasts sharply with his finance sector trades (34 trades, 0% win rate, -4.69% avg return). His trading style is classified as `COMMITTEE_TRADER` and `POOR_PERFORMER` with a `quality_tier` of D.
Trades 5y322
Volume$5.1M
Late filing—
Trader typeActive self-dealer
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC fundraising totals $7.04M, led by corporate_other (29.4%, $2.07M) and labor (21.4%, $1.51M) industries, per `get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`. Lobbying targeting his committee sectors totals $9.01M across 803 filings, with healthcare clients like HOSPICE COMPASSUS ($1.72M) dominating, per `get_lobbying_around_pol`. His `lobbying_to_committee_alignment_score` is 100.
PAC raised$7.0M
Individual—
Donors1,302
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Healthcare industry capture via committee jurisdiction, evidenced by $9.01M in lobbying targeting his committee sectors, with top client HOSPICE COMPASSUS spending $1.72M.
technology
Trades in AMZN, GOOGL while serving on Communications and Technology Subcommittee; 112 tech trades with 73.2% win rate.
↳ committee jurisdiction overlap
healthcare
$9.01M in lobbying targets his committee; top client HOSPICE COMPASSUS spent $1.72M.
↳ lobbying targeting
Top influence channels
lobbying targeting committee
HOSPICE COMPASSUS
$9.0M
pac funding
corporate_other industry PACs
$7.0M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 19 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 19 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Stronger Engagement for Indian Health Needs Act of 2025
Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act of 2025
AI PLAN Act
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Action Versus No Action Act
The U.S.-European Nuclear Energy Cooperation Act of 2025
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2025
National Nursing Workforce Center Act of 2025
National Biotechnology Initiative Act of 2025
Voting Pattern
Voted on 75 recorded votes with 100% attendance, supporting 39 and opposing 30 measures in the current Congress, per `get_voting_record`. Recent high-profile votes include a Yea on HR.1689 (On Passage) and a Nay on HR.261 (On Passage).
Loading intelligence layer…