Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician's trading record is defined by a complete absence of purchases and a 100% sales profile, totaling 58 trades and $940,000 over five years (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_volume_5yr_usd`, `get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_trades_5yr`). This all-sell pattern, with an average disclosure gap of 31.4 days and a 0% late filing rate (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.late_filing_rate_pct`), indicates a portfolio liquidation or wind-down posture rather than active market engagement. No sector-specific win-rate anomalies are present, as all win-rate data is null (`get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise`).
Trades 5y58
Volume$513K
Late filing—
Trader typeMinimal activity
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC contributions dominate, led by corporate other (29.8%), insurance (10.8%), and labor (9.8%) industries (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`). Individual donations are comparatively thin at roughly $1.85M (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_indiv_raised_usd`). The 100% alignment between lobbying spend and committee jurisdiction (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.lobbying_to_committee_alignment_score`) underscores a structural, access-oriented funding model.
PAC raised$24.2M
Individual—
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Insurance industry capture is evident via $2.63M in PAC contributions (10.8% of total) and 100% committee-aligned lobbying, with the politician serving on relevant subcommittees (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`, `get_sponsor_profile.profile.lobbying_to_committee_alignment_score`).
insurance
$2.63M from insurance PACs (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`)
↳ PAC contributions aligned with committee jurisdiction
Top influence channels
PAC Contributions
corporate_other
$24.2M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 18 active
Recent Activity
Voting Pattern
Recent high-profile votes show support for suspension motions and passage of various bills, with one recorded 'nay' on a passage vote for HR.261 (`get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes`).
Loading intelligence layer…