Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
Young Kim has filed zero trades across all recorded periods, with no purchases, sales, family trades, or late filings on record, according to `get_sponsor_profile.profile.trading_style`. This makes her one of the cleanest profiles on stock-activity metrics, with no sector anomalies or timing patterns to analyze. Her complete lack of trading activity eliminates the most direct conflict vector, shifting risk assessment entirely to structural donor-to-jurisdiction alignment.
Trades 5y0
Buys / sells0 / 0
Volume 5y—
Late filing—
Trader typeMinimal activity
Narrative from model run 2026-04-30; figures in the stat row are live (deduplicated, 5y).
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
Total PAC direct support is $22.5M, with corporate_other leading at 31.8% ($7.16M) and leadership PACs at 21.2% ($4.77M), from `get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`. The FairShake PAC's $1.92M in independent expenditure support for crypto-friendly legislation is a key structural signal, as noted in `get_sponsor_profile.profile.expected_next_action`. Finance and insurance industries contribute 9.8% ($2.2M) and 5.7% ($1.27M) respectively, aligning with her Financial Services Committee seat.
Direct PAC$6.4M
Outside $ for$4.6M
Outside $ against$9.5M
Cycles5
FEC PAC + independent-expenditure files, all cycles on record, never summed across direction. By cycle and industry →
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Cryptocurrency industry capture via FairShake PAC's $1.92M independent expenditure support while she sits on Financial Services Committee, per `get_sponsor_profile.profile.expected_next_action`.
cryptocurrency
$1.92M in support for crypto-friendly legislation
↳ Independent expenditure support from FairShake PAC while on Financial Services Committee
finance
`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[2]`
↳ PAC direct contributions from finance industry ($2.2M, 9.8%) while on Financial Services Committee
Top influence channels
PAC direct contributions
corporate_other
$22.5M
Lobbying targeting committees
AMERICAN LEGION
$7.5M
Independent expenditure support (FairShake PAC)
FairShake PAC
$1.9M
Committees3
Carve-outs on traded tickers0
Narrative from model run 2026-04-30. Jurisdiction vs. trades, committee by committee →
Recent Stock Trades
No reported stock trades on record for Young Kim.
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 14 active · all →
↓ free sample below · 13 more for Members
Voting Pattern
Voted yea on 61 of 75 recent votes (81.3% support rate) with 100% attendance, per `get_voting_record`. Recent high-profile votes include yea on HR.2493 and S.1020, and nay on HR.1689, indicating general party alignment with occasional breaks.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Young Kim trade stocks?
No STOCK Act trade disclosures appear in GovGreed's database for Young Kim. Members must disclose trades over $1,000 within 45 days; a member with no filings either holds no individual stocks, trades through exempt vehicles like broad mutual funds, or has never filed.
How can I track Young Kim's stock trades?
GovGreed ingests House Clerk STOCK Act filings daily and scores each trade against committee assignments, bill activity, and donor patterns. This page updates automatically; GovGreed members get real-time alerts the moment a new Young Kim disclosure lands.
Loading intelligence layer…