Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician's trading is defined by a severe sector performance anomaly. Against an overall win rate of 44% (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.win_rate_overall`), they achieve a 79.1% win rate on 114 technology trades and a 75% win rate on 78 finance trades (`get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise`). This 35.1 and 31.0 percentage point divergence, respectively, indicates specialized, high-frequency trading (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.trading_styles`) in these sectors. The pattern is opportunistic, with a concentrated basket of tickers and heavy sector rotation (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_pattern`).
Trades 5y532
Volume$4.3M
Late filing—
Trader typeActive self-dealer
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
Total fundraising is significant, with $4.83M from PACs and $9.08M from individuals over 5 years (`get_sponsor_profile.profile`). The industry capture signal is strong, driven by a 100% lobbying-to-committee alignment score, where $3.46M in lobbying targets his Energy and Commerce Committee jurisdiction (`get_sponsor_profile.profile`). Top PAC industries are ideological_conservative and party_republican groups (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.top_pac_industries`).
PAC raised$7.7M
Individual—
Donors6,100
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Strong capture by healthcare and energy industries, evidenced by $3.46M in lobbying targeting his committee sectors (`get_sponsor_profile.profile`) and $395,750 from energy PACs (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`).
technology
Trades in tech sector (114 trades, 79.1% win rate) while serving on Energy and Commerce Committee which oversees telecom/tech policy (`get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise`, `get_lobbying_around_pol.committee_sectors`).
↳ committee_jurisdiction
healthcare
$217,500 from healthcare PACs (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`) and $1.72M in lobbying from HOSPICE COMPASSUS targeting his committee (`get_lobbying_around_pol.top_lobbying_clients_targeting_pols_committees`).
↳ donor_and_lobbying_alignment
Top influence channels
pac funding
corporate_other industry PACs
$7.7M
committee jurisdiction
House Committee on Energy and Commerce
$3.5M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 18 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 19 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Stronger Engagement for Indian Health Needs Act of 2025
Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act of 2025
AI PLAN Act
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Action Versus No Action Act
The U.S.-European Nuclear Energy Cooperation Act of 2025
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2025
National Nursing Workforce Center Act of 2025
National Biotechnology Initiative Act of 2025
Voting Pattern
Voting attendance is 100% on 75 recent votes, with a yea-to-nay ratio of approximately 5.7 to 1 (`get_voting_record`). Recent high-profile votes show support for motions to pass bills like HR.2493 and S.1020 (`get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes`).
Loading intelligence layer…