Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
Harriet Hageman has filed zero personal trades since taking office, with a total trade count of 0 over five years and no trade volume (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_trades_5yr`: 0, `trade_volume_5yr_usd`: null). There is no sector anomaly to report, as she has no trading history. Her trading style is categorically inactive, presenting no stock-trading conflict-of-interest surface per `get_sponsor_profile.profile.trading_style`.
Trades 5y0
Buys / sells0 / 0
Volume 5y—
Late filing—
Trader typeMinimal activity
Narrative from model run 2026-04-30; figures in the stat row are live (deduplicated, 5y).
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC funding totals $2.8M (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.total_pac_direct_usd`: 2,807,872), with top industries being corporate_other (34.8%), leadership_pac (21.1%), and energy (8.2%) per `get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`. Individual contributions sum to $3.68M (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_indiv_raised_usd`: 3,682,414), led by retired donors (1,134 count) and energy donors (42 count) per `get_sponsor_profile.profile.top_donor_industries`. Lobbying spend targeting her committee sectors is $4.7M (`get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`: 4,701,340.52).
Direct PAC$943K
Outside $ for$1.6M
Outside $ against$455K
Cycles3
FEC PAC + independent-expenditure files, all cycles on record, never summed across direction. By cycle and industry →
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Energy industry capture via PAC donations ($231,500, 8.2% of PAC total) and lobbying ($4.7M targeting natural resources/energy committees) per `get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[2]` and `get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`.
energy
$231,500 PAC from energy industry (8.2% of total) per `get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[2]`; $4.7M lobbying on energy/mining sectors per `get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`
↳ PAC donations and lobbying targeting Natural Resources Committee jurisdiction
Top influence channels
Lobbying targeting committees
HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION
$4.7M
PAC funding
corporate_other
$2.8M
Committees3
Carve-outs on traded tickers0
Narrative from model run 2026-04-30. Jurisdiction vs. trades, committee by committee →
Recent Stock Trades
No reported stock trades on record for Harriet M. Hageman.
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 14 active · all →
↓ free sample below · 13 more for Members
Voting Pattern
Voted yea on 58 of 75 total votes (77.3% yea rate) with 100% attendance (`get_voting_record.yea_count`: 58, `total_votes`: 75, `attendance_pct`: 100.0). Recent high-profile votes include yea on HR.2493 and S.1020, and nay on HR.1689 per `get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes`.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Harriet M. Hageman trade stocks?
No STOCK Act trade disclosures appear in GovGreed's database for Harriet M. Hageman. Members must disclose trades over $1,000 within 45 days; a member with no filings either holds no individual stocks, trades through exempt vehicles like broad mutual funds, or has never filed.
How can I track Harriet M. Hageman's stock trades?
GovGreed ingests House Clerk STOCK Act filings daily and scores each trade against committee assignments, bill activity, and donor patterns. This page updates automatically; GovGreed members get real-time alerts the moment a new Harriet M. Hageman disclosure lands.
Loading intelligence layer…