Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
Harriet Hageman has filed zero personal trades since taking office, with a total trade count of 0 over five years and no trade volume (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_trades_5yr`: 0, `trade_volume_5yr_usd`: null). There is no sector anomaly to report, as she has no trading history. Her trading style is categorically inactive, presenting no stock-trading conflict-of-interest surface per `get_sponsor_profile.profile.trading_style`.
Trades 5y0
Volume—
Late filing—
Trader typeMinimal activity
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC funding totals $2.8M (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.total_pac_direct_usd`: 2,807,872), with top industries being corporate_other (34.8%), leadership_pac (21.1%), and energy (8.2%) per `get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`. Individual contributions sum to $3.68M (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_indiv_raised_usd`: 3,682,414), led by retired donors (1,134 count) and energy donors (42 count) per `get_sponsor_profile.profile.top_donor_industries`. Lobbying spend targeting her committee sectors is $4.7M (`get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`: 4,701,340.52).
PAC raised$2.8M
Individual—
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Energy industry capture via PAC donations ($231,500, 8.2% of PAC total) and lobbying ($4.7M targeting natural resources/energy committees) per `get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[2]` and `get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`.
energy
$231,500 PAC from energy industry (8.2% of total) per `get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[2]`; $4.7M lobbying on energy/mining sectors per `get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`
↳ PAC donations and lobbying targeting Natural Resources Committee jurisdiction
Top influence channels
Lobbying targeting committees
HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION
$4.7M
PAC funding
corporate_other
$2.8M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 357 votes (12mo) · 200 on passage · 90% with party on passage votes · 2 against
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 25 active
Recent Activity
No reported stock trades.
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 4 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Rural Obstetrics Readiness Act
CREATE AI Act of 2025
Critical Minerals Security Act of 2025
Voting Pattern
Voted yea on 58 of 75 total votes (77.3% yea rate) with 100% attendance (`get_voting_record.yea_count`: 58, `total_votes`: 75, `attendance_pct`: 100.0). Recent high-profile votes include yea on HR.2493 and S.1020, and nay on HR.1689 per `get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes`.
Loading intelligence layer…