Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician's disclosed congressional trading activity is minimal, with only 2 trades concentrated in finance, resulting in a 33% win rate and -16.3% average excess return (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.trading_style`). However, the `get_politician_intelligence` data reveals a significant anomaly: a portfolio of 1,184 trades shows a 33% overall win rate, but the technology sector has a 56.9% win rate on 178 trades, a 23.9-point positive divergence. The healthcare sector also shows a 50.8% win rate on 202 trades, a 17.8-point positive divergence. This suggests a large, pre-existing personal portfolio under management (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_volume_5yr_usd`) with sector-specific performance edges that are not reflected in his sparse, low-quality congressional disclosures (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.quality_tier`).
Trades 5y2,366
Volume$64.1M
Late filing—
Trader typeMinimal activity
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC funding totals $2.8M, led by corporate_other at 30.9% ($865,105) and labor at 21.4% ($599,000) (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`). Individual contributions total $6.8M (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_indiv_raised_usd`). Lobbying spend targeting his committee sectors is $6.1M (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_lobbying_spend_5yr_usd`), with a 100% lobbying-to-committee alignment rate creating structural conflict conditions (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.predicted_corruption_reason`).
PAC raised$2.8M
Individual—
Donors215
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Moderate capture signal, primarily through lobbying alignment on defense and infrastructure sectors, with $6.1M in spending targeting his committees (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.industry_capture_signal`, `get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`).
defense/technology
$6.1M in lobbying targets his Homeland Security and Judiciary committee sectors (`get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`)
↳ lobbying alignment
Top influence channels
Lobbying targeting their committees
AMERICAN LEGION
$6.1M
pac funding
corporate_other
$2.8M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 25 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 24 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
AI PLAN Act
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Justice for ALS Veterans Act of 2025
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2025
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
National Biotechnology Initiative Act of 2025
Ensuring Veterans’ Final Resting Place Act of 2025
Purple Heart Veterans Education Act of 2025
Student Veteran Benefit Restoration Act of 2025
Board of Veterans’ Appeals Attorney Retention and Backlog Reduction Act
Voting Pattern
Voted Nay 35 times and Yea 25 times in the last 75 votes, with 100% attendance (`get_voting_record`). Recent high-profile votes show multiple 'not_voting' positions on suspension motions (`get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes`).
Loading intelligence layer…