Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician's trading is defined by a stark sector anomaly: a 76.9% win rate on 76 technology trades, which outperforms his overall 34% win rate by 42.9 points (`sector_expertise[0].win_rate` vs `profile.win_rate_overall`). This high-frequency, options-heavy activity (58.5% of trades are options per `profile.options_pct`) is concentrated in technology, finance, and telecom (`profile.primary_sectors`). The overall performance is poor, with an average excess return of -16% (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.trading_style`), indicating speculative momentum-chasing rather than informed long-term investment.
Trades 5y342
Volume$38.3M
Late filing—
Trader typeActive self-dealer
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC funding is broad, with 202 committees contributing, led by defense (12.4% of PAC total), agriculture (15.0%), and real estate (7.6%) interests (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`). The `industry_capture_signal` is rated 'strong' (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.industry_capture_signal`), and lobbying-to-committee alignment is perfect at 100% (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.lobbying_to_committee_alignment_score`), indicating tight sector capture.
PAC raised$4.0M
Individual—
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Defense industry capture via $495k in PAC funding (12.4% of total) and $4.46M in targeted lobbying on committee jurisdictions (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[2]`, `get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`).
defense
100% alignment score with $4.46M in lobbying targeting his committees (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.lobbying_to_committee_alignment_score`, `get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`).
↳ lobbying-to-committee alignment
technology
76.9% win rate on 76 tech trades vs. 34% overall, suggesting potential informational advantage (`sector_expertise[0].win_rate`, `profile.win_rate_overall`).
↳ anomalous trading performance
Top influence channels
lobbying targeting
AMERICAN LEGION
$4.5M
PAC funding
corporate_other industry PACs
$4.0M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 24 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 21 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
AI PLAN Act
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Justice for ALS Veterans Act of 2025
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2025
National Biotechnology Initiative Act of 2025
Purple Heart Veterans Education Act of 2025
Ensuring Veterans’ Final Resting Place Act of 2025
Dental Care for Veterans Act
Student Veteran Benefit Restoration Act of 2025
Voting Pattern
Voting attendance is 100% with 75 votes in the current Congress (`get_voting_record.attendance_pct`, `get_voting_record.total_votes`). Recent high-profile votes show support for procedural motions and passage of bills, with occasional 'nay' votes on final passage, such as on HR.1689 (`get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes[3].vote_position`).
Loading intelligence layer…