Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
ANOMALY-FIRST: The politician's technology sector win rate of 83.3% (`sector_expertise[0].win_rate`) diverges by 45.3 points from his overall 38% win rate (`profile.win_rate_overall`) across 78 trades (`sector_expertise[0].trade_count`), generating an average return of 8.31%. This high-frequency, poor-performing trader (`profile.trading_styles`) concentrates on a narrow basket of large-cap technology and energy names, with a 26.7% late-filing rate and an average disclosure gap of 40.8 days (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.late_filing_rate_pct`, `.trading_style`).
Trades 5y344
Volume$3.8M
Late filing—
Trader typeActive self-dealer
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC contributions total $11.2M (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.total_pac_direct_usd`), led by corporate_other (33.1%), labor (15.5%), and trade associations (8.7%) (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`). The industry capture signal is strong (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.industry_capture_signal`), with 100% of lobbying events matching his committee jurisdiction (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.lobbying_to_committee_alignment_score`).
PAC raised$11.2M
Individual—
Donors1,072
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Strong capture by corporate_other, labor, and trade association PACs contributing $6.43M (57.3% of total) (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`), with lobbying fully aligned to his Ways and Means jurisdiction.
technology
100% lobbying-to-committee alignment score (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.lobbying_to_committee_alignment_score`) and trades in GOOGL, AMZN (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.recommended_watchlist_tickers`)
↳ Committee jurisdiction alignment with traded, lobbied tickers
Top influence channels
PAC Donations
corporate_other
$11.2M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 357 votes (12mo) · 200 on passage · 90% with party on passage votes · 2 against
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 25 active
Recent Activity
Voting Pattern
Voted on 75 recent bills with 100% attendance (`get_voting_record.attendance_pct`, `.total_votes`). Recent high-profile votes include a Nay on HR.261 passage and a Yea on its motion to recommit (`get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes[4,5]`).
Loading intelligence layer…