Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician's trading activity is extremely low, with only 8 total trades and a 33% overall win rate (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.win_rate_overall`). All trades are concentrated in the energy and basic materials sectors (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.primary_sectors`), but there is no sector-level win-rate anomaly due to insufficient trade count (`get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise`). The largest position was $75,000.5, and the average position size is $37,500 (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.largest_position`, `get_politician_intelligence.profile.avg_position_size`). The pattern suggests passive, infrequent activity rather than strategic trading.
Trades 5y15
Volume$499K
Late filing—
Trader typeMinimal activity
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC contributions total $9.15M, with corporate_other (34.5%), finance (18.1%), and insurance (8.1%) as the top industries (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`). The profile indicates strong industry capture, with a 72% donor-to-committee alignment score and $7.49M in lobbying targeting his committee sectors (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.donor_to_committee_alignment_score`, `get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`).
PAC raised$9.2M
Individual—
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Strong capture by the finance and cryptocurrency industries, evidenced by $1.65M from finance PACs and crypto executive donors, coupled with membership on key Financial Services subcommittees (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[1].amount_usd`, `get_sponsor_profile.profile.donor_base`).
Cryptocurrency/Finance
$1.65M from finance PACs and crypto executive donors funding a Financial Services Committee member sponsoring crypto legislation (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[1].amount_usd`, `get_sponsor_profile.profile.donor_base`).
↳ Donor-funded legislative advocacy
Top influence channels
PAC Donations
corporate_other
$9.2M
Lobbying Targeting Committees
AMERICAN LEGION
$7.5M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 25 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 26 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
AI PLAN Act
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Justice for ALS Veterans Act of 2025
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2025
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
The U.S.-European Nuclear Energy Cooperation Act of 2025
National Biotechnology Initiative Act of 2025
Ensuring Veterans’ Final Resting Place Act of 2025
Purple Heart Veterans Education Act of 2025
Student Veteran Benefit Restoration Act of 2025
Voting Pattern
Voted on 75 bills in the current Congress with 100% attendance, supporting 53 and opposing 15 (`get_voting_record.yea_count`, `get_voting_record.nay_count`). Recent high-profile votes include a 'yea' on HR.2493 and a 'nay' on S.1020 (`get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes`).
Loading intelligence layer…