Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician's 23% overall win rate masks a severe sector anomaly: a 50% win rate in technology on 50 trades, 27 points above the overall rate, with a 7.69% average return. This contrasts with a 0% win rate in energy on 50 trades. The profile shows a high-frequency, committee-aligned trading style (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.trading_styles`: COMMITTEE_TRADER, HIGH_FREQUENCY) concentrated in technology, energy, and healthcare, with an average position size of only $21,875 (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.avg_position_size`). Despite the high trade count, performance is poor (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.trading_styles`: POOR_PERFORMER), and recent activity includes small purchases and exchanges.
Trades 5y440
Volume$9.6M
Late filing—
Trader typeActive self-dealer
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC funding is dominated by corporate_other (38.9% of $17.6M total), labor (14.7%), and healthcare (9.1%) industries (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`). The donor-to-committee alignment score is 82 (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.donor_to_committee_alignment_score`), indicating strong structural overlap between donor interests (auto, energy, telecom) and Energy and Commerce jurisdiction. Lobbying spend targeting her committee sectors totals $13.3M (`get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`).
PAC raised$17.6M
Individual—
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Auto manufacturing and energy sectors, via PAC contributions ($7.6M from corporate_other and energy) and 100% lobbying-to-committee alignment score, deeply embedded in Energy and Commerce jurisdiction (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`, `get_sponsor_profile.profile.lobbying_to_committee_alignment_score`).
technology
50% win rate vs. 23% overall on 50 trades (`get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise[1]`).
↳ sector anomaly
energy
Energy sector donors contributed $767k (4.3% of PAC total) while she serves on Energy and Commerce (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[5]`, `get_lobbying_around_pol.politician_committees`).
↳ committee jurisdiction + donor alignment
Top influence channels
PAC Donations
corporate_other
$17.6M
Lobbying Targeting Committees
HOSPICE COMPASSUS
$13.3M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 25 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 23 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Stronger Engagement for Indian Health Needs Act of 2025
Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act of 2025
AI PLAN Act
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Action Versus No Action Act
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
The U.S.-European Nuclear Energy Cooperation Act of 2025
Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2025
Rural Obstetrics Readiness Act
National Biotechnology Initiative Act of 2025
National Nursing Workforce Center Act of 2025
Voting Pattern
Recent high-profile votes show support for sector-relevant bills like S.1020 (energy) and HR.1681 (broadband) (`get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes`). Voting attendance is 100% on 75 recorded votes, with a slight tendency to vote 'yea' (33 yea vs. 36 nay).
Loading intelligence layer…