Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
Scale-first: Carter's 34 lifetime trades and $2.83M total volume over 5 years (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_trades_5yr`, `trade_volume_5yr_usd`) define a low-frequency, passive portfolio. His 100% overall win rate (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.win_rate_overall`) is based on a small sample of 17 trades in the 5-year dataset. There is no sector anomaly to report, as the `PRE-COMPUTED SECTOR ANOMALIES` array is empty. His trading is heavily concentrated in a single local financial stock (ABCB), with 6 trades in the finance sector (`get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise[0].trade_count`), aligning with his `trade_pattern` of 'sector_concentrated' (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_pattern`).
Trades 5y34
Volume$1.9M
Late filing—
Trader typeDonor-funded · passive on trades
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
Healthcare-aligned PACs are the most concentrated institutional supporters, with pharma (11.9%) and healthcare (10.1%) comprising over 22% of PAC funds (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[1,2].pct_of_total`). This aligns with his Energy and Commerce Health subcommittee seat (`get_lobbying_around_pol.politician_committees`). Total PAC money ($5.63M) exceeds individual contributions ($4.35M) (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_pac_for_usd`, `total_indiv_raised_usd`).
PAC raised$23.3M
Individual—
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Pharma/healthcare industry capture via PAC donations totaling over $5.1M (pharma $2.77M + healthcare $2.35M) aligned with his Health subcommittee jurisdiction (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[1,2].amount_usd`).
healthcare
$5.1M from pharma/healthcare PACs (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[1,2].amount_usd`)
↳ PAC donations funding a Health subcommittee member
Top influence channels
PAC Donations
corporate_other
$23.3M
Lobbying Targeting Committees
HOSPICE COMPASSUS
$12.0M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 18 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 21 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Stronger Engagement for Indian Health Needs Act of 2025
Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act of 2025
AI PLAN Act
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Action Versus No Action Act
The U.S.-European Nuclear Energy Cooperation Act of 2025
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2025
National Biotechnology Initiative Act of 2025
National Nursing Workforce Center Act of 2025
Voting Pattern
In the current Congress, he has voted Yea on 56 of 75 recorded votes with 100% attendance (`get_voting_record.yea_count`, `total_votes`, `attendance_pct`). Recent high-profile votes show support for suspension-passage motions, with occasional Nay votes on passage (`get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes`).
Loading intelligence layer…