Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician's trading profile is defined by a severe performance anomaly: an overall win rate of 29% (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.win_rate_overall`) masks extreme sector divergences. In the energy sector, a 100% win rate on 82 trades (`get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise[3]`) outperforms the overall rate by 71 points, with an average return of 10.76%. Similarly, infrastructure shows a 100% win rate on 52 trades. This contrasts with a 0% win rate in the consumer sector on 18 trades. Despite 490 trades in the 5-year analysis period (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.total_trades`), the activity is characterized as 'inactive' and 'passive or advisor-managed' (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_pattern`), concentrated in a single stock (PG) and U.S. Treasuries, with a 29% win rate and a 'POOR_PERFORMER' style.
Trades 5y978
Volume$10.7M
Late filing—
Trader typeMinimal activity
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
Total PAC funding over 5 years is $27.89M (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.total_pac_direct_usd`), with top industries being corporate_other (33.3%), labor (9.7%), and healthcare (7.8%). Lobbying spend targeting the politician's committees totals $5.11M (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_lobbying_spend_5yr_usd`), but no matching filings indicate direct committee alignment (`get_lobbying_around_pol.matching_filings_count`). The industry capture signal is 'low' (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.industry_capture_signal`).
PAC raised$27.9M
Individual—
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
No single industry dominates via a clear quid-pro-quo mechanism; top PAC funding is a broad 'corporate_other' category at 33.3% of $27.89M (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[0]`).
All
609 late filings out of 978 total trades (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_pattern`).
↳ Systemic Disclosure Failure
Top influence channels
PAC Funding
corporate_other PACs
$27.9M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 14 active
Recent Activity
Voting Pattern
Voting attendance is 100% on 75 recent votes (`get_voting_record.attendance_pct`, `get_voting_record.total_votes`). Recent high-profile votes show support for Democratic leadership positions, including yea votes on HR.2493 and S.1020 (`get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes`).
Loading intelligence layer…