Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
Scale-first: The politician has executed only 7 trades over the past 5 years, with a total volume of approximately $210,000 (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_volume_5yr_usd`). The portfolio is small and infrequent, with no options activity and a 100% overall win rate (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.win_rate_overall`). The primary sectors are telecom and technology, but with only 8 and 6 trades respectively, no sector-level win-rate anomaly is present (`get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise`). The dominant procedural signal is an 86% late filing rate on 14 total trades (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.late_filing_rate_pct`), representing a significant compliance issue.
Trades 5y14
Volume$112K
Late filing—
Trader typeMinimal activity
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
Total PAC direct contributions over the period are $15.77M (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.total_pac_direct_usd`), with top industries being corporate_other (36.6%), pharma (8.0%), and trade associations (7.0%) (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`). The profile indicates a strong industry capture signal, with a 100% lobbying-to-committee alignment score (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.lobbying_to_committee_alignment_score`).
PAC raised$15.8M
Individual—
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Strong capture signal in defense and technology sectors, evidenced by $7.25M in defense PAC contributions (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[5].amount_usd`) and $5.51M in tech PAC contributions (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[7].amount_usd`), aligned with committee jurisdictions.
technology
Sits on Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology, and the Law (`get_lobbying_around_pol.politician_committees[17].name`) while receiving $551K from tech PACs (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[7].amount_usd`).
↳ committee_jurisdiction
defense
Sits on Defense Appropriations Subcommittee (`get_lobbying_around_pol.politician_committees[2].name`) while receiving $725K from defense PACs (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[5].amount_usd`).
↳ appropriations_subcommittee
Top influence channels
PAC direct contributions
corporate_other industry
$15.8M
Lobbying targeting their committees
HOSPICE COMPASSUS
$15.4M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 0 votes (12mo)
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 20 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 34 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Stronger Engagement for Indian Health Needs Act of 2025
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act of 2025
AI PLAN Act
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Action Versus No Action Act
Justice for ALS Veterans Act of 2025
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2025
The U.S.-European Nuclear Energy Cooperation Act of 2025
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
Loading intelligence layer…