Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician's trading profile is defined by a 94% late-filing rate (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.late_filing_rate_pct`) and a concentrated portfolio of 8 tickers (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_pattern`). While no sector shows a ≥10-point win-rate divergence on ≥50 trades (`PRE-COMPUTED SECTOR ANOMALIES`), the financial services sector stands out with a 100% win-rate across 8 trades, yielding a 1.4% average return, which starkly contrasts with a 0% overall win-rate (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.win_rate_overall` and `sector_expertise`). This activity aligns with a `COMMITTEE_TRADER` and `HIGH_FREQUENCY` style (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.trading_styles`).
Trades 5y166
Volume$3.4M
Late filing—
Trader typeActive self-dealer
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC contributions dominate, with $1.88M raised from PACs, led by corporate_other (37.4%), trade associations (12.7%), and leadership PACs (12.6%) (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`). Individual contributions are comparatively low at $535K (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_indiv_raised_usd`). Lobbying spend targeting her committee jurisdictions totals $6.77M over 5 years (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_lobbying_spend_5yr_usd`), with a 100% alignment score between lobbying and committee work (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.lobbying_to_committee_alignment_score`).
PAC raised$1.9M
Individual—
Donors276
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Financial services, via committee jurisdiction (Homeland Security, Science) and concurrent trading, with $676K in aligned lobbying spend (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_lobbying_spend_5yr_usd`).
financial services
Serves on Homeland Security (transportation/maritime security) and Science (energy) committees while trading financial services tickers like ICAPITAL, with $676K in lobbying targeting those committees (`get_lobbying_around_pol.committee_sectors`, `get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_lobbying_spend_5yr_usd`).
↳ committee jurisdiction overlap with trading
Top influence channels
pac funding
corporate_other
$1.9M
committee lobbying
AMERICAN LEGION
$676K
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 80% with party on passage votes · 1 against
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 24 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 26 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
AI PLAN Act
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Justice for ALS Veterans Act of 2025
The U.S.-European Nuclear Energy Cooperation Act of 2025
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2025
National Biotechnology Initiative Act of 2025
Purple Heart Veterans Education Act of 2025
Ensuring Veterans’ Final Resting Place Act of 2025
Dental Care for Veterans Act
Voting Pattern
Maintains perfect 100% attendance (`get_voting_record.attendance_pct`) with a voting record of 55 yea to 15 nay votes on 75 total votes (`get_voting_record.yea_count`, `nay_count`, `total_votes`). Recent high-profile votes include supporting HR.2493 and opposing S.1020 on 2026-04-21 (`get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes`).
Loading intelligence layer…