Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician has an effectively inactive trading record with only 2 total trades totaling approximately $100,000 (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_trades_5yr`, `get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_volume_5yr_usd`). Both filings were submitted late, with an average disclosure gap of 686 days (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.late_filing_rate_pct`, `get_politician_forecast_context.his_avg_disclosure_lag_days`). No sector anomalies are present (`get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise` is empty).
Trades 5y0
Buys / sells0 / 0
Volume 5y—
Late filing—
Trader typeMinimal activity
Narrative from model run 2026-04-30; figures in the stat row are live (deduplicated, 5y).
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC funding totals $2.39 million (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_pac_for_usd`) with top industries being labor unions, Latino advocacy, tribal nations, and trial lawyers (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.top_pac_industries`). The donor industry breakdown shows corporate_other (28.2%), labor (22.6%), and leadership PACs (20.1%) as the largest contributors by dollar volume (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`).
Direct PAC$1.5M
Outside $ for$1.1M
Outside $ against$20K
Cycles4
FEC PAC + independent-expenditure files, all cycles on record, never summed across direction. By cycle and industry →
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Tribal nations and natural resources sectors, via PAC donations and lobbying targeting the Natural Resources Committee, with over $4.2M in sector lobbying spend (`get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`).
tribal affairs / natural resources
Donor base description cites 'multiple federally recognized tribes' as top contributors (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.donor_base`).
↳ donor concentration from tribal nations overlapping with committee jurisdiction
Top influence channels
donor alignment
corporate_other industry PACs
$5.0M
committee jurisdiction
HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION
$4.2M
Committees2
Carve-outs on traded tickers0
Narrative from model run 2026-04-30. Jurisdiction vs. trades, committee by committee →
Recent Stock Trades · 5 oldest visible · 5 most recent 🔒 for Members
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 14 active · all →
↓ free sample below · 13 more for Members
Voting Pattern
Voting record shows 31 yea and 34 nay votes on 75 total votes (`get_voting_record.yea_count`, `get_voting_record.nay_count`, `get_voting_record.total_votes`). Recent high-profile votes include support for HR.2493 and S.1020, and opposition to HR.261 (`get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes`).
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Teresa Leger Fernandez trade stocks?
Teresa Leger Fernandez has 1 STOCK Act filings on record, but none dated within the last five years. Members must disclose trades over $1,000 within 45 days.
How can I track Teresa Leger Fernandez's stock trades?
GovGreed ingests House Clerk STOCK Act filings daily and scores each trade against committee assignments, bill activity, and donor patterns. This page updates automatically; GovGreed members get real-time alerts the moment a new Teresa Leger Fernandez disclosure lands.
Loading intelligence layer…