Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician has filed zero trades since taking office, with a `get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_trades_5yr` of 0 and a `get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_volume_5yr_usd` of null. There are no sector anomalies to report, as the `get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise` array is empty and the `PRE-COMPUTED SECTOR ANOMALIES` list is empty. The `get_sponsor_profile.profile.trading_style` is 'inactive' with a clean disclosure record and a `get_sponsor_profile.profile.late_filing_rate_pct` of 0.
Trades 5y0
Buys / sells0 / 0
Volume 5y—
Late filing—
Trader typeMinimal activity
Narrative from model run 2026-04-30; figures in the stat row are live (deduplicated, 5y).
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC fundraising totals $5,719,068 (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_pac_for_usd`), with the largest share (29.5%) from leadership PACs (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[0]`). Corporate PACs account for 27.4% (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[1]`), while energy PACs contribute 7.2% (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[2]`), aligning with committee assignments.
Direct PAC$1.1M
Outside $ for$4.6M
Outside $ against$10.0M
Cycles3
FEC PAC + independent-expenditure files, all cycles on record, never summed across direction. By cycle and industry →
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Moderate energy industry capture via PAC donations ($273,000, 7.2% of total) and committee jurisdiction over Natural Resources (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[2]`, `get_sponsor_profile.profile.committees`).
Energy
$273,000 in energy PAC donations (7.2% of total) while serving on Natural Resources Committee, per `get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[2]` and `get_sponsor_profile.profile.committees`.
↳ Donor-to-Committee Alignment
Top influence channels
Lobbying Targeting Committees
HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION
$8.1M
PAC Donations
leadership_pac
$5.7M
Committees3
Carve-outs on traded tickers0
Narrative from model run 2026-04-30. Jurisdiction vs. trades, committee by committee →
Recent Stock Trades
No reported stock trades on record for Nicholas J. Begich.
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 14 active · all →
↓ free sample below · 13 more for Members
Voting Pattern
Has cast 75 votes (`get_voting_record.total_votes`) with 100% attendance (`get_voting_record.attendance_pct`), voting 'yea' 60 times and 'nay' 8 times, including a recent 'yea' on S.1020, a bill impacting energy infrastructure (`get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes[0]`).
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Nicholas J. Begich trade stocks?
No STOCK Act trade disclosures appear in GovGreed's database for Nicholas J. Begich. Members must disclose trades over $1,000 within 45 days; a member with no filings either holds no individual stocks, trades through exempt vehicles like broad mutual funds, or has never filed.
How can I track Nicholas J. Begich's stock trades?
GovGreed ingests House Clerk STOCK Act filings daily and scores each trade against committee assignments, bill activity, and donor patterns. This page updates automatically; GovGreed members get real-time alerts the moment a new Nicholas J. Begich disclosure lands.
Loading intelligence layer…