What This Bill Does · Plain English
Summary
Plain-English summary not yet available for this bill. Check back after our next analysis run.
Action Timeline
2025-07-21
Introduced in House
2025-07-21
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
2025-07-21
Introduced in House
Frequently Asked Questions
Did HR.4556 pass?
HR.4556 is still alive. Current stage: COMMITTEE. Pass likelihood: pending.
Who sponsored HR.4556?
HR.4556 was sponsored by Emanuel Cleaver (D-Missouri).
Full Bill Text
119 HR 4556 IH: Protect Our Treatment for Enamel, Erosion, and Tooth Health Act U.S. House of Representatives 2025-07-21 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 4556 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES July 21, 2025 Mr. Cleaver (for himself, Mr. Frost , Mr. Fields , Mr. Thanedar , Mr. Bell , Mr. Gottheimer , Mr. Davis of North Carolina , Mrs. Sykes , and Ms. Norton ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce A BILL To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to seek to enter into an agreement with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to carry out a rapid response evidence review of proposed rules relating to fluoride, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Protect Our Treatment for Enamel, Erosion, and Tooth Health Act or the Protect Our TEETH Act . 2. Fluoride in drinking water Section 1412(b)(12) of the Safe Drinking Water Act ( 42 U.S.C. 300g–1(b)(12) ) is amended by adding at the end the following: (C) Fluoride (i) National Academies rapid response evidence review Prior to publishing in the Federal Register a proposed rule to establish the maximum contaminant level goal for fluoride, or, in the national primary drinking water regulation for fluoride, specify the maximum contaminant level for fluoride, the Administrator shall— (I) seek to enter into an agreement with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to carry out a rapid response evidence review of such proposed rule, which agreement shall specify a timeline of no fewer than 90 days and no more than 180 days for carrying out such rapid response evidence review; (II) provide the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine with all data and other information being used to justify such proposed rule; and (III) consider the results of any such rapid response evidence review with respect to such proposed rule. (ii) Publication The Administrator shall publish in the Federal Register, as a part of any proposed rule under this subparagraph, the entirety of the final report of any rapid response evidence review relating to such proposed rule. (iii) Use of existing funds The Administrator may use funds otherwise available to the Administrator to carry out this subparagraph. .
Loading intelligence layer…