Plain English
Summary
Plain-English summary not yet available for this bill. Check back after our next analysis run.
Market Impact Map
Action Timeline
2025-03-05
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
2025-03-05
Introduced in House
2025-03-05
Introduced in House
Full Bill Text
119 HR 1890 IH: Turkey Diplomatic Realignment Act U.S. House of Representatives 2025-03-05 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1890 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 5, 2025 Mr. Schneider (for himself, Mr. Bilirakis , Ms. Titus , Ms. Malliotakis , Mr. Pappas , and Mr. Gottheimer ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs A BILL To administratively reassign responsibility for the Republic of Turkey within the Department of State and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Turkey Diplomatic Realignment Act . 2. Findings Congress finds the following: (1) The Republic of Turkey occupies a unique geopolitical position at the intersection of Europe and the Middle East, influencing security, economic, and diplomatic interests of the United States in both regions. (2) The Department of State currently assigns responsibility for Turkey within the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs, despite Turkey’s extensive engagement in Middle Eastern affairs and security issues. (3) A reassignment of Turkey to the Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs would better align diplomatic strategy and facilitate regional cooperation. (4) Turkey’s foreign policy trajectory in recent years has distanced it from the European Union and The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), as evidenced by its strategic realignments and domestic political shifts that challenge European democratic norms. (5) European institutions have increasingly sidelined Turkey from full integration, delaying accession talks and raising concerns over human rights, democratic governance, and rule of law. (6) Turkey’s growing partnerships with non-western powers, including Russia and China, along with its pursuit of BRICS membership, underscore its shifting priorities away from western alignment. (7) The Turkish government’s increasing engagement with Islamist actors, its role in conflicts such as Syria and Libya, and its strained relations with Israel have deepened concerns over its long-term reliability as a western partner. (8) The reassignment serves as a diplomatic signal reflecting Turkey’s diminishing European prospects and encourages national debate within Turkey about its geopolitical future, particularly in light of its perceived marginalization from European strategic decision-making. (9) Turkey has provided political and logistical support to Hamas, hosting members of the group and facilitating fundraising activities, further straining its relationships with western allies and contributing to concerns over its regional alignment. (10) The United States remains committed to a strong relationship with Turkey but must recalibrate its diplomatic engagement in recognition of changing realities, ensuring U.S. regional policy remains consistent with evolving security and economic dynamics. 3. Administrative reassignment (a) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall administratively reassign responsibility for the Republic of Turkey from the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs to the Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs within the Department of State. (b) Report to congress Not later than 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report— (1) describing the effectiveness and implications of the reassignment required by subsection (a); and (2) providing recommendations for further changes regarding the assignment of responsibility for Turkey. (c) Rule of construction Nothing in this section may be construed to prevent the Secretary from modifying or discontinuing the use of regional bureaus as necessary to advance the diplomatic objectives of the United States.
Loading intelligence layer…