🔓
Sign in as a Member to unlock the full view of SRES.597. · Full carveout list, all affected companies, party defectors, and 30-day trade predictions.
Become a Member$24.50/mo already a Member? Sign in →
SRES.597 · 119TH CONGRESS

A resolution providing for the authority to initiate litigation for actions by the President and Department of Justice officials inconsistent with their duties under the laws of the United States.

Status
In Committee
Latest Action
2026-02-05
Sponsor
Schumer, Charles E. (D-New York)
Official Source
Investability
0/100
Stage
COMMITTEE
Related Bills
0
Full Text
4,888 chars
Alive
Yes

What This Bill Does · Plain English

Summary
Plain-English summary not yet available for this bill. Check back after our next analysis run.

Action Timeline

2026-02-05
Referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration. (text: CR S512-513)
2026-02-05
Submitted in Senate

Frequently Asked Questions

Did SRES.597 pass?
SRES.597 is still alive. Current stage: COMMITTEE. Pass likelihood: pending.
Who sponsored SRES.597?
SRES.597 was sponsored by Charles E. Schumer (D-New York).

Full Bill Text

119 SRES 597 IS: Providing for the authority to initiate litigation for actions by the President and Department of Justice officials inconsistent with their duties under the laws of the United States. U.S. Senate 2026-02-05 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. III 119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. RES. 597 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES February 5, 2026 Mr. Schumer (for himself, Mr. Merkley , Mr. Luján , Mr. Schiff , Mr. Van Hollen , Mr. Blumenthal , Mr. Durbin , Mr. Whitehouse , Ms. Klobuchar , Mr. Wyden , Mr. Kim , Mr. Gallego , Mr. Booker , Mr. Heinrich , Mr. Schatz , and Ms. Hirono ) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration RESOLUTION Providing for the authority to initiate litigation for actions by the President and Department of Justice officials inconsistent with their duties under the laws of the United States. Whereas Public Law 119–38 (the Epstein Files Transparency Act, referred to in this resolution as the Act ) was passed with overwhelming bipartisan support in both the Senate and the House of Representatives, and with their vote, every United States Senator, and 427 bipartisan House members sent a clear and simple message: Release all the Epstein files; Whereas the Act required the release of all records, documents, communications, and investigation materials in a searchable and downloadable format by December 19, 2025; Whereas the Act provided for limited, narrowly tailored grounds for withholding or redacting information made public in compliance with the law; Whereas, on December 19, 2025, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said the Justice Department would release an initial, but not complete, portion of the Epstein files, which would include several hundred thousand documents from its Epstein investigative files; Whereas the Act provides no exception to meeting the December 19, 2025, release deadline; Whereas the Department of Justice released only 12,285 documents, representing less than 1 percent of the total files in the Department’s possession, between December 19, 2025, and December 22, 2025; Whereas the Department of Justice sought to inflate the total numbers of documents released; Whereas, on its website, the Department of Justice has also posted other Epstein-related material, which was already made public before enactment of the Act, including records previously produced under the Freedom of Information Act, the July Maxwell interview, the Bureau of Prison footage of Epstein’s jail cell on the night of his death, prior Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility and Office of Inspector General reports and statements, and a link to the website of the Committee on Oversight of the House of Representatives; Whereas the Department of Justice announced on December 24, 2025, that it had apparently discovered over 1,000,000 additional documents, and that the Department was reviewing over 5,000,000 pages, which would take several weeks to review and release to the public; Whereas the Department of Justice released another production of files on January 30, 2025, which it represented as the final production of Epstein files; Whereas the Department of Justice announced it would release 3,000,000 pages, which was half of the 6,000,000 pages it acknowledged collecting, yet it released fewer than 2,700,000 pages, falling materially short of its stated production; Whereas the released documents were extensively redacted, not in compliance with the limited scope of redactions permitted in the Act; and Whereas the released material improperly disclosed Epstein survivor information, while in other instances, withholding or redacting information concerning Epstein co-conspirators and enablers from disclosure: Now, therefore, be it That— (1) the Majority Leader of the Senate shall initiate or intervene in one or more civil actions in the name of the Senate in a Federal Court of competent jurisdiction to seek appropriate relief regarding the failure of the Department of Justice to act in a manner consistent with Public Law 119–38 (the Epstein Files Transparency Act); (2) the Majority Leader of the Senate shall notify the Senate when the body initiates or intervenes in any civil action pursuant to this resolution; and (3) the Office of Senate Legal Counsel, or any other counsel designated at the direction of the Majority Leader of the Senate, following consultation with the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall represent the Senate in any civil action initiated, or in which the Senate intervenes, pursuant to this resolution, and any counsel so designated is authorized to designate funds for such representation approved by the Majority Leader of the Senate out of the miscellaneous line item appropriations.
🔒 GovGreed Pro · Trading Intelligence on SRES.597 Get Access — $24.50/mo
Loading intelligence layer…
Bill text sourced from GovInfo.gov · public domain · last updated 2026-09-14. Plain-English summary, score breakdown, and trading-intelligence panels are GovGreed-original analysis derived from STOCK Act filings, SEC Form 4 disclosures, FEC contributions, and Senate LDA lobbying reports — all publicly filed federal records. GovGreed is not affiliated with the U.S. Government. Not financial advice. [live render]