🔓
Sign in as a Member to unlock the full view of SRES.136. · Full carveout list, all affected companies, party defectors, and 30-day trade predictions.
Become a Member$24.50/mo already a Member? Sign in →
SRES.136 · 119TH CONGRESS

A resolution affirming the rule of law and the legitimacy of judicial review.

Status
In Committee
Latest Action
2025-03-25
Sponsor
Durbin, Richard J. (D-Illinois)
Official Source
Investability
55/100
Stage
COMMITTEE
Related Bills
1
Full Text
1,452 chars
Alive
Yes

What This Bill Does · Plain English

Summary
Plain-English summary not yet available for this bill. Check back after our next analysis run.

Action Timeline

2025-03-25
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S1837-1838)
2025-03-25
Introduced in Senate

Frequently Asked Questions

Did SRES.136 pass?
SRES.136 is still alive. Current stage: COMMITTEE. Pass likelihood: 55%.
Who sponsored SRES.136?
SRES.136 was sponsored by Richard J. Durbin (D-Illinois).

Full Bill Text

119 SRES 136 IS: Affirming the rule of law and the legitimacy of judicial review. U.S. Senate 2025-03-25 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. III 119th CONGRESS 1st Session S. RES. 136 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES March 25, 2025 Mr. Durbin (for himself, Mr. Schumer , Ms. Hirono , Mr. Hickenlooper , Mr. Coons , Mr. Whitehouse , Ms. Klobuchar , Ms. Duckworth , Mr. Welch , Mr. Padilla , Mr. Wyden , Mr. Ossoff , Mr. Blumenthal , Mrs. Shaheen , and Mr. Kelly ) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary RESOLUTION Affirming the rule of law and the legitimacy of judicial review. That the Senate affirms that— (1) Article III of the Constitution of the United States vests the judicial Power of the United States . . . in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish ; (2) as Chief Justice Marshall held in the Supreme Court’s landmark 1803 decision Marbury v. Madison, It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is ; (3) the Constitution of the United States and established precedent require the executive branch to comply with all Federal court rulings; and (4) if the executive branch disagrees with a ruling by a Federal court, it may appeal that ruling when authorized by law.
🔒 GovGreed Pro · Trading Intelligence on SRES.136 Get Access — $24.50/mo
Loading intelligence layer…
Bill text sourced from GovInfo.gov · public domain · last updated 2026-09-14. Plain-English summary, score breakdown, and trading-intelligence panels are GovGreed-original analysis derived from STOCK Act filings, SEC Form 4 disclosures, FEC contributions, and Senate LDA lobbying reports — all publicly filed federal records. GovGreed is not affiliated with the U.S. Government. Not financial advice. [live render]