🔓
Sign in as a Member to unlock the full view of S.661. · Full carveout list, all affected companies, party defectors, and 30-day trade predictions.
Become a Member$24.50/mo already a Member? Sign in →
S.661 · 119TH CONGRESS

Postal Processing Protection Act

Status
In Committee
Latest Action
2025-02-20
Sponsor
Rounds, Mike (R-South Dakota)
Official Source
Investability
36/100
Stage
COMMITTEE
Related Bills
1
Full Text
2,395 chars
Alive
Yes

What This Bill Does · Plain English

Summary
Plain-English summary not yet available for this bill. Check back after our next analysis run.

Action Timeline

2025-02-20
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
2025-02-20
Introduced in Senate

Frequently Asked Questions

Did S.661 pass?
S.661 is still alive. Current stage: COMMITTEE. Pass likelihood: 36%.
Who sponsored S.661?
S.661 was sponsored by Mike Rounds (R-South Dakota).

Full Bill Text

119 S661 IS: Postal Processing Protection Act U.S. Senate 2025-02-20 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. II 119th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 661 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES February 20, 2025 Mr. Rounds (for himself, Mr. Durbin , Mr. Wicker , and Mr. Welch ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs A BILL To require the United States Postal Service to apply certain requirements when closing a processing, shipping, delivery, or other facility supporting a post office. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Postal Processing Protection Act . 2. Postal processing protection Section 404(d) of title 39, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking any post office and inserting any post office, or any acceptance, processing, shipping, delivery, distribution, or other facility that is owned or operated by the Postal Service that supports 1 or more post offices ; (2) in paragraph (2)— (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking a post office and inserting a post office, or an acceptance, processing, shipping, delivery, distribution, or other facility that is owned or operated by the Postal Service that supports 1 or more post offices ; and (B) in subparagraph (A)(iii), by striking post offices and inserting post offices, or acceptance, processing, shipping, delivery, distribution, or other facilities that are owned or operated by the Postal Service that support 1 or more post offices, ; (3) in paragraph (3), by striking a post office and inserting a post office, or an acceptance, processing, shipping, delivery, distribution, or other facility that is owned or operated by the Postal Service that supports 1 or more post offices, ; (4) in paragraph (4), by striking a post office and inserting a post office, or an acceptance, processing, shipping, delivery, distribution, or other facility that is owned or operated by the Postal Service that supports 1 or more post offices, ; and (5) in paragraph (5), by striking any post office and inserting any post office, or any acceptance, processing, shipping, delivery, distribution, or other facility that is owned or operated by the Postal Service that supports 1 or more post offices, .
🔒 GovGreed Pro · Trading Intelligence on S.661 Get Access — $24.50/mo
Loading intelligence layer…
Bill text sourced from GovInfo.gov · public domain · last updated 2026-09-14. Plain-English summary, score breakdown, and trading-intelligence panels are GovGreed-original analysis derived from STOCK Act filings, SEC Form 4 disclosures, FEC contributions, and Senate LDA lobbying reports — all publicly filed federal records. GovGreed is not affiliated with the U.S. Government. Not financial advice. [live render]