🔓
Sign in as a Member to unlock the full view of S.1349. · Full carveout list, all affected companies, party defectors, and 30-day trade predictions.
Become a Member$24.50/mo already a Member? Sign in →
S.1349 · 119TH CONGRESS

Ruby Mountains Protection Act

Status
In Committee
Latest Action
2026-02-12
Sponsor
Official Source
Investability
34/100
Stage
COMMITTEE
Related Bills
0
Full Text
2,874 chars
Alive
Yes

What This Bill Does · Plain English

GovGreed Synthesis · AI extraction
This bill withdraws approximately 309,272 acres of National Forest System land in the Ruby Mountains subdistrict and approximately 39,926 acres of National Wildlife Refuge System land in Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge, both in Nevada, from all forms of operation under the mineral leasing laws. This means oil, gas, and mineral leasing and development on these federal lands would be permanently prohibited, subject to valid existing rights.

Action Timeline

2026-02-12
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining. Hearings held.
2025-04-08
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
2025-04-08
Introduced in Senate

Frequently Asked Questions

Did S.1349 pass?
S.1349 is still alive. Current stage: COMMITTEE. Pass likelihood: 34%.
What does S.1349 do?
This bill withdraws approximately 309,272 acres of National Forest System land in the Ruby Mountains subdistrict and approximately 39,926 acres of National Wildlife Refuge System land in Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge, both in Nevada, from all forms of operation under the mineral leasing laws. This means oil, gas, and mineral leasing and development on these federal lands would be permanently prohibited, subject to valid existing rights.
Who sponsored S.1349?
S.1349 was sponsored by Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nevada).

Full Bill Text

119 S1349 IS: Ruby Mountains Protection Act U.S. Senate 2025-04-08 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. II 119th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 1349 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES April 8, 2025 Ms. Cortez Masto (for herself and Ms. Rosen ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources A BILL To withdraw the National Forest System land in the Ruby Mountains subdistrict of the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest and the National Wildlife Refuge System land in Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge, Elko and White Pine Counties, Nevada, from operation under the mineral leasing laws. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Ruby Mountains Protection Act . 2. Withdrawal of certain National Forest System land (a) Withdrawal Subject to valid existing rights, the approximately 309,272 acres of Federal land and interests in the land located in the Ruby Mountains subdistrict of the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest within the area depicted on the Forest Service map entitled S. 258 Ruby Mountains Protective Act and dated December 5, 2019, as National Forest System Lands are withdrawn from all forms of operation under the mineral leasing laws. (b) Application Any land or interest in land within the boundary of the Ruby Mountains subdistrict of the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest that is acquired by the United States after the date of enactment of this Act shall be withdrawn in accordance with subsection (a). (c) Availability of map The map described in subsection (a) shall be on file and available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the Forest Service. 3. Withdrawal of certain National Wildlife Refuge System land (a) Withdrawal (1) In general Subject to valid existing rights, the approximately 39,926.10 acres of Federal land and interests in the land located in the Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge and depicted on the United States Fish and Wildlife Service map entitled S. XXX Ruby Mountains Protection Act and dated February 23, 2021, as Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge are withdrawn from all forms of operation under the mineral leasing laws, subject to paragraph (2). (2) Exception The withdrawal under paragraph (1) shall not apply to noncommercial refuge management activities by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. (b) Application Any land or interest in land within the boundary of the Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge that is acquired by the United States after the date of enactment of this Act shall be withdrawn in accordance with subsection (a). (c) Availability of map The map described in subsection (a)(1) shall be on file and available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service.
🔒 GovGreed Pro · Trading Intelligence on S.1349 Get Access — $24.50/mo
Loading intelligence layer…
Bill text sourced from GovInfo.gov · public domain · last updated 2026-07-28. Plain-English summary, score breakdown, and trading-intelligence panels are GovGreed-original analysis derived from STOCK Act filings, SEC Form 4 disclosures, FEC contributions, and Senate LDA lobbying reports — all publicly filed federal records. GovGreed is not affiliated with the U.S. Government. Not financial advice. [live render]