🔓
Sign in as a Member to unlock the full view of HR.7632. · Full carveout list, all affected companies, party defectors, and 30-day trade predictions.
Become a Member$24.50/mo already a Member? Sign in →
HR.7632 · 119TH CONGRESS

SHADOW Act

Status
Reported
Latest Action
2026-03-26
Sponsor
Self, Keith (R-Texas)
Official Source
Investability
0/100
Stage
REPORTED
Related Bills
0
Full Text
6,960 chars
Alive
Yes

What This Bill Does · Plain English

Summary
Plain-English summary not yet available for this bill. Check back after our next analysis run.

Action Timeline

2026-03-26
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 46 - 0.
2026-03-26
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
2026-02-20
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
2026-02-20
Introduced in House
2026-02-20
Introduced in House

Frequently Asked Questions

Did HR.7632 pass?
HR.7632 is still alive. Current stage: REPORTED. Pass likelihood: pending.
Who sponsored HR.7632?
HR.7632 was sponsored by Keith Self (R-Texas).

Full Bill Text

119 HR 7632 IH: Strategic Hybrid Activities Defense and Operations for the West Act U.S. House of Representatives 2026-02-20 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 7632 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 20, 2026 Mr. Self (for himself, Mr. Keating , and Mr. Sherman ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs A BILL To designate a Coordinator for hybrid warfare accountability, require the Secretary of State to submit a report identifying Chinese entities materially supporting Russia’s defense industrial base and recommending appropriate sanctions, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Strategic Hybrid Activities Defense and Operations for the West Act or the SHADOW Act . 2. Assessment and engagement relating to hybrid warfare activities against United States interests The Secretary of State shall— (1) in consultation with other relevant officials of the Department of State, assess the persistent and growing threat of hybrid warfare activities, including in Europe against United States interests as a matter of importance to the foreign policy of the United States; (2) engage diplomatically with foreign governments including in Europe to promote transatlantic cooperation in countering and addressing hybrid warfare activities that may threaten transatlantic stability, the security of United States citizens and institutions abroad, and the stability of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO); and (3) encourage closer United States information sharing with NATO allies on hybrid warfare activities, including on Chinese and Russian cyber campaigns including in Europe, through measures such as the adoption of common attribution language, shared red lines for disruptive activities, coordinated non-kinetic response options, and common definitions for gray zone activities, to strengthen shared understanding, preparedness, and mitigation efforts. 3. Coordinator for hybrid warfare accountability (a) Designation Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall designate a senior official from among existing officers or employees of the Department of State, who shall report to the Under Secretary for Political Affairs, to serve as the principal official responsible for coordinating all United States interagency and allied engagement on hybrid warfare (in this section referred to as the Coordinator ). (b) Duties The Coordinator shall oversee the efforts of the Department of State relating to the following: (1) Assessing, integrating, and disseminating information on hybrid warfare activities, including Chinese and Russian-linked efforts as well as those of non-state actors, for use in diplomatic engagement, interagency strategy, and allied coordination. (2) Identifying analytic and operational gaps in the United States understanding of hybrid threats and developing recommendations to address those gaps. (3) Coordinating within NATO and among NATO allies, as well as with other key partners, such as South Korea, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand, to facilitate timely information sharing, including the exchange of assessments, and to support the development of aligned response strategies among allied and partner countries. (4) Supporting resilience and de-risking efforts with allies and partners in sectors vulnerable to foreign coercion, including critical infrastructure, telecommunications, energy, and strategic materials. (c) Plan Not later than 60 days after the designation of a Coordinator pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary of State shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees— (1) the name of the official designated as the Coordinator; and (2) a strategy describing the manner in which the Coordinator will support the Department of State and interagency efforts to address hybrid threats. (d) Report Not later than 1 year after the designation of a Coordinator pursuant to subsection (a), and annually thereafter for 3 years, the Coordinator shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report detailing the following: (1) Key assessments and findings on hybrid warfare activities. (2) Progress on interagency and allied coordination. (3) Measures taken to support resilience and de-risking efforts with allies and partners. (e) Form Each report required by this section may be submitted in classified form as necessary to protect sensitive sources and methods. (f) Hybrid warfare activities defined For purposes of this section, the term hybrid warfare activities refers to the use of a combination of military and non-military, as well as covert and overt, means to influence, destabilize, or undermine United States interests abroad. Such activities may include the following among others: (1) Information campaigns targeting United States interests. (2) Cyber-attacks. (3) Economic pressure, coercion, or manipulation. (4) Deployment of operatives, irregular armed groups, and uses of regular forces in ways that threaten United States or allied interests. (5) The deliberate weaponization or exploitation of migration flows to exert political, economic, or security pressure on the United States or its allies. (6) Sabotage, damage, or disruption of critical onshore or offshore infrastructure, including energy, telecommunications, or undersea infrastructure. (7) Targeted assassinations or attempted assassinations undertaken as part of a broader effort to intimidate, destabilize, or coerce. 4. Report on the nexus of Chinese entities that materially support Russia’s defense industrial base (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Coordinator designated pursuant to section 3(a), in consultation with the relevant heads of other Federal departments and offices, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that— (1) identifies each Chinese entity the Coordinator determines materially supports Russia’s defense industrial base; and (2) recommends sanctions, export controls, or other measures the Coordinator determines are necessary or appropriate to address such support. (b) Form The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex only for the protection of intelligence sources and methods relating to the matters contained in such report. (c) Publication The Secretary of State shall publish on a publicly available website of the Department of State the unclassified portion of the report required by subsection (a). 5. Appropriate congressional committees defined In this Act, the term appropriate congressional committees means the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.
🔒 GovGreed Pro · Trading Intelligence on HR.7632 Get Access — $24.50/mo
Loading intelligence layer…
Bill text sourced from GovInfo.gov · public domain · last updated 2026-07-29. Plain-English summary, score breakdown, and trading-intelligence panels are GovGreed-original analysis derived from STOCK Act filings, SEC Form 4 disclosures, FEC contributions, and Senate LDA lobbying reports — all publicly filed federal records. GovGreed is not affiliated with the U.S. Government. Not financial advice. [live render]