🔓
Sign in as a Member to unlock the full view of HR.7551. · Full carveout list, all affected companies, party defectors, and 30-day trade predictions.
Become a Member$24.50/mo already a Member? Sign in →
HR.7551 · 119TH CONGRESS

HILTON Act

Status
In Committee
Latest Action
2026-02-12
Sponsor
Mills, Cory (R-Florida)
Official Source
Investability
0/100
Stage
COMMITTEE
Related Bills
0
Full Text
2,486 chars
Alive
Yes

What This Bill Does · Plain English

Summary
Plain-English summary not yet available for this bill. Check back after our next analysis run.

Action Timeline

2026-02-12
Introduced in House
2026-02-12
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
2026-02-12
Introduced in House

Frequently Asked Questions

Did HR.7551 pass?
HR.7551 is still alive. Current stage: COMMITTEE. Pass likelihood: pending.
Who sponsored HR.7551?
HR.7551 was sponsored by Cory Mills (R-Florida).

Full Bill Text

119 HR 7551 IH: Halting Inappropriate Limits Targeting Officers Now Act U.S. House of Representatives 2026-02-12 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 7551 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 12, 2026 Mr. Mills introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform A BILL To prohibit the head of a Federal agency from entering into an agreement with an entity that discriminates against Federal law enforcement, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Halting Inappropriate Limits Targeting Officers Now Act or the HILTON Act . 2. Contracts prohibited (a) In general The head of a Federal agency may not enter into an agreement for a covered service if such covered service is provided by an entity that, during the preceding 1-year period— (1) refused a Federal law enforcement officer a covered service and stated that such refusal was due to an official duty of such officer; or (2) had in place a policy that expressly permitted refusal of a covered service to a Federal law enforcement officer due to an official duty of such officer. (b) Waiver authority Notwithstanding subsection (a), the head of a Federal agency may waive the application of such subsection to an entity if, in the determination of such head— (1) with respect to a necessary covered service, there is no other entity available to provide a comparable service within a 50-mile radius; or (2) such entity is a parent company of an entity that refused covered services under subsection (a), and such parent company takes sufficient remedial action against such entity. (c) Entities under common control All entities which are members of the same controlled group of corporations (within the meaning of section 52(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) and all entities under common control (within the meaning of section 52(b) of such Code) shall be treated as 1 entity for purposes of this section. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) Covered service The term covered service means each of the following services: (A) Lodging. (B) Transportation. (C) Food and beverage. (D) Healthcare. (E) Vehicle rental. (F) Property rental. (G) Storage. (2) Federal agency The term Federal agency has the meaning given the term executive agency in section 133 of the title 41, United States Code.
🔒 GovGreed Pro · Trading Intelligence on HR.7551 Get Access — $24.50/mo
Loading intelligence layer…
Bill text sourced from GovInfo.gov · public domain · last updated 2026-10-12. Plain-English summary, score breakdown, and trading-intelligence panels are GovGreed-original analysis derived from STOCK Act filings, SEC Form 4 disclosures, FEC contributions, and Senate LDA lobbying reports — all publicly filed federal records. GovGreed is not affiliated with the U.S. Government. Not financial advice. [live render]