🔓
Sign in as a Member to unlock the full view of HR.7284. · Full carveout list, all affected companies, party defectors, and 30-day trade predictions.
Become a Member$24.50/mo already a Member? Sign in →
HR.7284 · 119TH CONGRESS

ICE OUT Act

Status
In Committee
Latest Action
2026-01-30
Sponsor
Goldman, Daniel S. (D-New York)
Official Source
Investability
0/100
Stage
COMMITTEE
Related Bills
0
Full Text
2,058 chars
Alive
Yes

What This Bill Does · Plain English

Summary
Plain-English summary not yet available for this bill. Check back after our next analysis run.

Action Timeline

2026-01-30
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
2026-01-30
Introduced in House
2026-01-30
Introduced in House

Frequently Asked Questions

Did HR.7284 pass?
HR.7284 is still alive. Current stage: COMMITTEE. Pass likelihood: pending.
Who sponsored HR.7284?
HR.7284 was sponsored by Daniel S. Goldman (D-New York).

Full Bill Text

119 HR 7284 IH: ICE OUT Act U.S. House of Representatives 2026-01-30 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 7284 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 30, 2026 Mr. Goldman of New York (for himself and Mr. Swalwell ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL To reform qualified immunity standards for officers and agents of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement or U.S. Customs and Border Protection engaged in law enforcement activities, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the ICE OUT Act . 2. Reforming qualified immunity standards for ICE agents engaged in law enforcement activities Section 1979 of the Revised Statutes ( 42 U.S.C. 1983 ) is amended— (1) by inserting (a) before Every person ; (2) by inserting of the United States or before of any State ; and (3) by adding at the end the following: (b) In the case of any action brought under this section or any other Federal law against an officer or agent of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement or U.S. Customs and Border Protection engaged in law enforcement— (1) no immunity defense shall be available if the facts alleged by the plaintiff would constitute excessive force in violation of the 4th amendment; and (2) in all other cases, an immunity defense shall only be available if the defendant acted in a manner consistent with rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws clearly established at the time at which the conduct subject to the cause of action occurred. (c) In determining when immunity shall apply under subsection (b)(2), a court must first determine whether the facts alleged would constitute a violation of the rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution prior to determining whether any such rights were clearly established at the time at which the conduct subject to the cause of action occurred. .
🔒 GovGreed Pro · Trading Intelligence on HR.7284 Get Access — $24.50/mo
Loading intelligence layer…
Bill text sourced from GovInfo.gov · public domain · last updated 2026-09-14. Plain-English summary, score breakdown, and trading-intelligence panels are GovGreed-original analysis derived from STOCK Act filings, SEC Form 4 disclosures, FEC contributions, and Senate LDA lobbying reports — all publicly filed federal records. GovGreed is not affiliated with the U.S. Government. Not financial advice. [live render]