🔓
Sign in as a Member to unlock the full view of HR.7171. · Full carveout list, all affected companies, party defectors, and 30-day trade predictions.
Become a Member$24.50/mo already a Member? Sign in →
HR.7171 · 119TH CONGRESS

Fair Legal Access Grants Act

Status
In Committee
Latest Action
2026-01-21
Sponsor
Chu, Judy (D-California)
Official Source
Investability
0/100
Stage
COMMITTEE
Related Bills
1
Full Text
4,122 chars
Alive
Yes

What This Bill Does · Plain English

GovGreed Synthesis · AI extraction
This bill amends the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act to create a new grant program. The Attorney General will award grants to states, local governments, and Tribal Governments to provide legal resources for individuals (covered petitioners) seeking extreme risk protection orders (ERPOs), which are court orders aimed at temporarily removing firearms from individuals deemed a risk to themselves or others. Funds can be used for legal counsel, translation services, legal resource centers, hiring personnel, subgrants to nonprofits, and training.

Carveouts & Earmarks · 1 line items · $350M tagged

Specific dollar amounts in this bill that flow to identifiable companies or programs — the actual cash trail.

$350M
Sec. 2 (509(c))
"There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $50,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2028 through 2034."
→ Attorney General

Action Timeline

2026-01-21
Introduced in House
2026-01-21
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
2026-01-21
Introduced in House

Frequently Asked Questions

Did HR.7171 pass?
HR.7171 is still alive. Current stage: COMMITTEE. Pass likelihood: pending.
What does HR.7171 do?
This bill amends the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act to create a new grant program. The Attorney General will award grants to states, local governments, and Tribal Governments to provide legal resources for individuals (covered petitioners) seeking extreme risk protection orders (ERPOs), which are court orders aimed at temporarily removing firearms from individuals deemed a risk to themselves or others. Funds can be used for legal counsel, translation services, legal resource centers, hiring personnel, subgrants to nonprofits, and training.
Who sponsored HR.7171?
HR.7171 was sponsored by Judy Chu (D-California).
How much money does HR.7171 spend?
HR.7171 contains $350M in identified line-item carveouts to specific programs and companies, across 1 earmarks.

Full Bill Text

119 HR 7171 IH: Fair Legal Access Grants Act U.S. House of Representatives 2026-01-21 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 7171 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 21, 2026 Ms. Chu (for herself, Mr. Goldman of New York , Ms. Norton , Mr. Lynch , Mr. Frost , Mr. Moskowitz , Mr. Johnson of Georgia , Mrs. McBath , and Ms. Schakowsky ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to award grants for providing legal resources for petitioners seeking extreme risk protection orders, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Fair Legal Access Grants Act . 2. Legal resources for extreme risk protection order petitioners Subpart I of part E of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 ( 34 U.S.C. 10151 et seq. ) is amended— (1) by redesignating section 509 as section 510; and (2) by inserting after section 508 the following: 509. Legal resources for extreme risk protection order petitioners (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Covered petitioner The term covered petitioner means an individual who is eligible to seek an extreme risk protection order from an applicable State or Tribal court. (2) Extreme risk protection order The term extreme risk protection order means a written order or warrant, issued by a State or Tribal court or signed by a magistrate or other comparable judicial officer, the primary purpose of which is to reduce the risk of firearm-related death or injury by— (A) prohibiting a named individual from owning, purchasing, possessing, receiving, or having under the custody or control of the individual a firearm; or (B) having a firearm removed or requiring the surrender of a firearm from a named individual. (3) Firearm The term firearm has the meaning given the term in section 921 of title 18, United States Code. (b) Authority (1) In general The Attorney General shall award grants to States, local governments, and Tribal Governments for the purpose of providing legal representation and resources to covered petitioners. (2) Use of funds A State, local government, or Tribal Government that receives a grant under paragraph (1) may use amounts from the grant to— (A) ensure covered petitioners have access to counsel and interpretation and translation services; (B) establish legal resources centers— (i) for publishing and distributing information and responding to inquiries relating to the extreme risk protection order legal process of the applicable State or Tribal Government; and (ii) that focus on expanding resources in multiple languages other than English; (C) hire personnel to— (i) process and represent covered petitioners, such as personnel in local district attorney offices and law enforcement agencies; or (ii) serve as legal resource coordinators; (D) award subgrants to nonprofit organizations that provide community legal aid; and (E) train legal service providers, law enforcement officers, prosecutors, court personnel, and other individuals on the differences between an extreme risk protection order and a domestic violence protection order to ensure that victims of domestic violence seek the form of protection order that best addresses their safety needs. (c) Authorization of appropriations There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $50,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2028 through 2034. . 3. Jurisdiction of Federal courts (a) Definition In this section, the term covered petitioner has the meaning given the term in section 509(a) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as added by section 2 of this Act. (b) No jurisdiction No Federal court may exercise jurisdiction over a Federal, State, Tribal, or local cause of action in response to a covered petitioner filing a petition for an extreme risk protection order if the covered petitioner did not file a false or intentionally harassing petition.
🔒 GovGreed Pro · Trading Intelligence on HR.7171 Get Access — $24.50/mo
Loading intelligence layer…
Bill text sourced from GovInfo.gov · public domain · last updated 2026-10-12. Plain-English summary, score breakdown, and trading-intelligence panels are GovGreed-original analysis derived from STOCK Act filings, SEC Form 4 disclosures, FEC contributions, and Senate LDA lobbying reports — all publicly filed federal records. GovGreed is not affiliated with the U.S. Government. Not financial advice. [live render]