🔓
Sign in as a Member to unlock the full view of HR.4846. · Full carveout list, all affected companies, party defectors, and 30-day trade predictions.
Become a Member$24.50/mo already a Member? Sign in →
HR.4846 · 119TH CONGRESS

ROAD Act

Status
In Committee
Sponsor
Fine, Randy (R-Florida)
Official Source
Investability
0/100
Stage
COMMITTEE
Related Bills
0
Full Text
2,071 chars
Alive
Yes

What This Bill Does · Plain English

Summary
Plain-English summary not yet available for this bill. Check back after our next analysis run.

Action Timeline

2025-08-01
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
2025-08-01
Introduced in House
2025-08-01
Introduced in House

Frequently Asked Questions

Did HR.4846 pass?
HR.4846 is still alive. Current stage: COMMITTEE. Pass likelihood: pending.
Who sponsored HR.4846?
HR.4846 was sponsored by Randy Fine (R-Florida).

Full Bill Text

119 HR 4846 IH: Reinstating Orderly Access for Drivers Act U.S. House of Representatives 2025-08-01 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 4846 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES August 1, 2025 Mr. Fine introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for an affirmative defense in a criminal or civil action relating to motor vehicle incidents if cases in which a certain party is convicted of riot. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Reinstating Orderly Access for Drivers Act or the ROAD Act . 2. Affirmative defense in a criminal or civil action; party convicted of riot (a) In general Chapter 2 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 40B. Affirmative defense in a criminal or civil action; party convicted of riot (a) In a criminal or civil action for damages for personal injury, wrongful death, or property damage carried out using a motor vehicle, it is an affirmative defense that such action arose from an injury or damage sustained by a participant acting in furtherance of a riot. The affirmative defense authorized by this section shall be established by evidence that the participant has been convicted of violating section 2101, or by proof of the commission of such crime by a preponderance of the evidence. (b) In a civil action in which a defendant raises an affirmative defense under this section, the court shall, on motion by the defendant, stay the action during the pendency of a criminal action that forms the basis for the defense, unless the court finds that a conviction in the criminal action would not form a valid defense under this section. . (b) Clerical amendment The analysis for chapter 2 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 40B. Affirmative defense in a criminal or civil action; party convicted of riot. .
🔒 GovGreed Pro · Trading Intelligence on HR.4846 Get Access — $24.50/mo
Loading intelligence layer…
Bill text sourced from GovInfo.gov · public domain · last updated 2026-09-14. Plain-English summary, score breakdown, and trading-intelligence panels are GovGreed-original analysis derived from STOCK Act filings, SEC Form 4 disclosures, FEC contributions, and Senate LDA lobbying reports — all publicly filed federal records. GovGreed is not affiliated with the U.S. Government. Not financial advice. [live render]