🔓
Sign in as a Member to unlock the full view of HR.4576. · Full carveout list, all affected companies, party defectors, and 30-day trade predictions.
Become a Member$24.50/mo already a Member? Sign in →
HR.4576 · 119TH CONGRESS

Build More Housing Near Transit Act of 2025

Status
In Committee
Latest Action
2025-07-22
Sponsor
Peters, Scott H. (D-California)
Official Source
Investability
0/100
Stage
COMMITTEE
Related Bills
1
Full Text
4,203 chars
Alive
Yes

What This Bill Does · Plain English

Summary
Plain-English summary not yet available for this bill. Check back after our next analysis run.

Action Timeline

2025-07-22
Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
2025-07-21
Introduced in House
2025-07-21
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
2025-07-21
Introduced in House

Frequently Asked Questions

Did HR.4576 pass?
HR.4576 is still alive. Current stage: COMMITTEE. Pass likelihood: pending.
Who sponsored HR.4576?
HR.4576 was sponsored by Scott H. Peters (D-California).

Full Bill Text

119 HR 4576 IH: Build More Housing Near Transit Act of 2025 U.S. House of Representatives 2025-07-21 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 4576 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES July 21, 2025 Mr. Peters (for himself and Mr. Moore of Utah ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure A BILL To amend title 49, United States Code, to include affordable housing incentives in certain capital investment grants, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Build More Housing Near Transit Act of 2025 . 2. Affordable housing incentives in capital investment grants Section 5309 of title 49, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a)— (A) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (7); and (B) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following: (6) Pro-housing policy The term pro-housing policy — (A) means any State or local action that will remove regulatory barriers to the construction or preservation of housing units, including affordable housing units; and (B) shall include any State or local action that— (i) reduces or eliminates parking minimums; (ii) establishes a by-right approval process for multi-family housing under which land use development approval is limited to determining that the development meets objective zoning and design standards that— (I) involve no subjective judgment by a public official; (II) are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available to both the land use developer and the public official prior to submission; and (III) include only such standards as are published and adopted by ordinance or resolution by a jurisdiction before submission of a development application; (iii) reduces or eliminates minimum lot sizes; (iv) commits substantial publicly-held real property to the development or preservation of housing that includes a substantial number of dwelling units affordable to low-income households; (v) eliminates or raises residential property height limits or increases the number of dwelling units permitted to be constructed under a by-right approval process; and (vi) carries out other policies as determined by the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. ; (2) in subsection (g)(2), by adding at the end the following: (D) Eligibility for adjustment of rating for project justification criteria for pro-housing policies In evaluating and rating a project as a whole for project justification under subparagraph (A), the Secretary may increase 1 point on the 5-point scale (high, medium-high, medium, medium-low, or low) the rating of a project if the applicant submits documented evidence of pro-housing policies for areas located within walking distance of, and accessible to, transit facilities along the project route. (E) Consultation In awarding the increased rating described in subparagraph (D), the Secretary shall consult with the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to develop the methodology to evaluate, as feasible, the extent to which the pro-housing policies documented by the applicant will result, through new production and preservation, in an amount of housing units, including housing units affordable below the area median income, that is appropriate to expected housing demand in the project area over the life of the project. ; and (3) in subsection (o)— (A) in paragraph (1)— (i) in subparagraph (B), by striking and at the end; (ii) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and ; and (iii) by adding at the end the following: (D) information concerning projects for which the applicant submitted pro-housing policies under subsection (g)(2)(D) and received an adjustment of rating for project justification, including the pro-housing policies submitted and the amount of housing units expected through new production and preservation, including affordable housing, as a result of the expected results of the policies, as measured under subsection (g)(2)(E). .
🔒 GovGreed Pro · Trading Intelligence on HR.4576 Get Access — $24.50/mo
Loading intelligence layer…
Bill text sourced from GovInfo.gov · public domain · last updated 2026-10-12. Plain-English summary, score breakdown, and trading-intelligence panels are GovGreed-original analysis derived from STOCK Act filings, SEC Form 4 disclosures, FEC contributions, and Senate LDA lobbying reports — all publicly filed federal records. GovGreed is not affiliated with the U.S. Government. Not financial advice. [live render]