🔓
Sign in as a Member to unlock the full view of HR.4556. · Full carveout list, all affected companies, party defectors, and 30-day trade predictions.
Become a Member$24.50/mo already a Member? Sign in →
HR.4556 · 119TH CONGRESS

Protect Our TEETH Act

Status
In Committee
Latest Action
2025-07-21
Sponsor
Cleaver, Emanuel (D-Missouri)
Official Source
Investability
0/100
Stage
COMMITTEE
Related Bills
0
Full Text
2,502 chars
Alive
Yes

What This Bill Does · Plain English

Summary
Plain-English summary not yet available for this bill. Check back after our next analysis run.

Action Timeline

2025-07-21
Introduced in House
2025-07-21
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
2025-07-21
Introduced in House

Frequently Asked Questions

Did HR.4556 pass?
HR.4556 is still alive. Current stage: COMMITTEE. Pass likelihood: pending.
Who sponsored HR.4556?
HR.4556 was sponsored by Emanuel Cleaver (D-Missouri).

Full Bill Text

119 HR 4556 IH: Protect Our Treatment for Enamel, Erosion, and Tooth Health Act U.S. House of Representatives 2025-07-21 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 4556 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES July 21, 2025 Mr. Cleaver (for himself, Mr. Frost , Mr. Fields , Mr. Thanedar , Mr. Bell , Mr. Gottheimer , Mr. Davis of North Carolina , Mrs. Sykes , and Ms. Norton ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce A BILL To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to seek to enter into an agreement with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to carry out a rapid response evidence review of proposed rules relating to fluoride, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Protect Our Treatment for Enamel, Erosion, and Tooth Health Act or the Protect Our TEETH Act . 2. Fluoride in drinking water Section 1412(b)(12) of the Safe Drinking Water Act ( 42 U.S.C. 300g–1(b)(12) ) is amended by adding at the end the following: (C) Fluoride (i) National Academies rapid response evidence review Prior to publishing in the Federal Register a proposed rule to establish the maximum contaminant level goal for fluoride, or, in the national primary drinking water regulation for fluoride, specify the maximum contaminant level for fluoride, the Administrator shall— (I) seek to enter into an agreement with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to carry out a rapid response evidence review of such proposed rule, which agreement shall specify a timeline of no fewer than 90 days and no more than 180 days for carrying out such rapid response evidence review; (II) provide the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine with all data and other information being used to justify such proposed rule; and (III) consider the results of any such rapid response evidence review with respect to such proposed rule. (ii) Publication The Administrator shall publish in the Federal Register, as a part of any proposed rule under this subparagraph, the entirety of the final report of any rapid response evidence review relating to such proposed rule. (iii) Use of existing funds The Administrator may use funds otherwise available to the Administrator to carry out this subparagraph. .
🔒 GovGreed Pro · Trading Intelligence on HR.4556 Get Access — $24.50/mo
Loading intelligence layer…
Bill text sourced from GovInfo.gov · public domain · last updated 2026-10-12. Plain-English summary, score breakdown, and trading-intelligence panels are GovGreed-original analysis derived from STOCK Act filings, SEC Form 4 disclosures, FEC contributions, and Senate LDA lobbying reports — all publicly filed federal records. GovGreed is not affiliated with the U.S. Government. Not financial advice. [live render]