🔓
Sign in as a Member to unlock the full view of HR.4481. · Full carveout list, all affected companies, party defectors, and 30-day trade predictions.
Become a Member$24.50/mo already a Member? Sign in →
HR.4481 · 119TH CONGRESS

ARMS Act

Status
In Committee
Sponsor
Aderholt, Robert B. (R-Alabama)
Official Source
Investability
0/100
Stage
COMMITTEE
Related Bills
0
Full Text
2,599 chars
Alive
Yes

What This Bill Does · Plain English

Summary
Plain-English summary not yet available for this bill. Check back after our next analysis run.

Action Timeline

2025-07-17
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
2025-07-17
Introduced in House
2025-07-17
Introduced in House

Frequently Asked Questions

Did HR.4481 pass?
HR.4481 is still alive. Current stage: COMMITTEE. Pass likelihood: pending.
Who sponsored HR.4481?
HR.4481 was sponsored by Robert B. Aderholt (R-Alabama).

Full Bill Text

119 HR 4481 IH: Accelerate Revenue for Manufacturing and Sales Act U.S. House of Representatives 2025-07-17 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 4481 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES July 17, 2025 Mr. Aderholt (for himself, Mr. Moskowitz , Mr. Panetta , and Mr. Zinke ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs A BILL To amend the Arms Export Control Act to modify the authorities relating to the Special Defense Acquisition Fund. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Accelerate Revenue for Manufacturing and Sales Act or the ARMS Act . 2. Findings Congress finds the following: (1) The United States defense industrial base plays a critical role in advancing both security and prosperity. (2) There is increasing global demand for United States manufactured defense capabilities, highlighting the need to maintain a strong, agile, and scalable defense production capacity. (3) In recent years, the combined value of Foreign Military Sales (FMS) and Direct Commercial Sales (DCS) has significantly exceeded domestic defense procurement budgets, with international demand for United States defense products approaching two-to-one over domestic acquisition. (4) Delays in delivering defense articles to allied and partner nations expose vulnerabilities in the current acquisition and sales process that risks undermining United States strategic credibility abroad. (5) The Special Defense Acquisition Fund (SDAF) has demonstrated effectiveness in reducing delivery times and enabling advanced contracting for high-demand defense items prior to the completion of formal agreements. (6) Strengthening and expanding the SDAF would increase the efficiency and predictability of defense article deliveries to foreign partners, support the United States defense industrial base, and improve economies of scale. (7) Timely access to United States defense systems by allies and partners strengthens interoperability, improves coalition readiness, deters shared threats, and reinforces long-standing strategic relationships. (8) Enhancing SDAF authorities and capacity aligns with United States national interests and supports continued leadership in the global defense market. 3. Modifications to Special Defense Acquisition Fund Section 51(b)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act ( 22 U.S.C. 2795(b)(1) ) is amended by striking sales made under and all that follows through the actual value and inserting sales .
🔒 GovGreed Pro · Trading Intelligence on HR.4481 Get Access — $24.50/mo
Loading intelligence layer…
Bill text sourced from GovInfo.gov · public domain · last updated 2026-07-29. Plain-English summary, score breakdown, and trading-intelligence panels are GovGreed-original analysis derived from STOCK Act filings, SEC Form 4 disclosures, FEC contributions, and Senate LDA lobbying reports — all publicly filed federal records. GovGreed is not affiliated with the U.S. Government. Not financial advice. [live render]