What This Bill Does · Plain English
Summary
Plain-English summary not yet available for this bill. Check back after our next analysis run.
Action Timeline
2025-05-24
Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
2025-05-23
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
2025-05-23
Introduced in House
2025-05-23
Introduced in House
Frequently Asked Questions
Did HR.3608 pass?
HR.3608 is still alive. Current stage: COMMITTEE. Pass likelihood: pending.
Who sponsored HR.3608?
HR.3608 was sponsored by David J. Taylor (R-Ohio).
Full Bill Text
119 HR 3608 IH: Connor’s Law U.S. House of Representatives 2025-05-23 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 3608 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES May 23, 2025 Mr. Taylor (for himself, Ms. Hageman , Mr. Collins , Mr. Gosar , Ms. Van Duyne , and Mr. Finstad ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure A BILL To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to the requirement to test drivers of commercial motor vehicles for English proficiency, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as Connor’s Law . 2. Requiring minimum language skills for commercial motor vehicle operators (a) In general Section 31308(1) of title 49, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A) by striking and at the end; (2) in subparagraph (B) by inserting and at the end; and (3) by adding at the end the following: (C) can read and speak the English language sufficiently to— (i) converse with the general public; (ii) understand highway traffic signs and signals in the English language; (iii) respond to official inquiries; and (iv) make entries on reports and records; . (b) Out-of-Service order for noncompliance with minimum language requirement (1) Declaration of out of service An individual operating a commercial motor vehicle who is determined by an authorized enforcement officer to be noncompliant with section 391.11(b)(2) of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation), shall be declared out of service. (2) Rule of construction Nothing in paragraph (1) shall be construed to change, limit, or otherwise impact out-of-service orders that are— (A) not covered under paragraph (1); and (B) carried out pursuant to applicable Federal law, Federal regulation, or the North American Standard Out-of-Service Criteria.
Loading intelligence layer…